Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page:
Go
Search posts:

Right's Rubber Fetus Dolls, Scare Tactics at Commission on Status of Women

Posted Mar 13 2009 8:00am
The 53rd session on the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) is coming to a close, and there is much to tell about what right-wing organizations have been up to throughout the duration of this year's session.  The fact that this year's primary theme is "the equal sharing of responsibilities between women and men, including caregiving in the context of HIV/AIDS" mattered little to these organizations, which brought the same old issues to the table: abortion and sexual orientation. 

Abortion and sexual orientation are inextricably interconnected in the minds of individuals from right-wing organizations like Family Watch International, Concerned Women for America and United Families International.  According to these groups, "sexual rights" is code for "homosexuality" and "reproductive health" is code for "abortion" and the advocates for sexual and reproductive health and rights are all "radical feminists" and "homosexual activists."  

I attended two CSW parallel events sponsored by Endeavor Forum Inc., an Australian organization established to "counter feminism, defend the unborn and the traditional family," and Concerned Women for America, which seeks to "promote Biblical values among all ...thereby reversing the decline in moral values in our nation."  They come to meetings like this not only to influence the outcome of the Commission's "agreed conclusions" relating to the priority themes, but also for the opportunity to reach out to the members of civil society present for the CSW.   

Their goal is to cultivate ambassadors for their messages - offering refreshments and gifts of baby clothes, among other things, to establish a feeling of good will.  The most bizarre example of the "freebies" distributed at the parallel events was recounted to me by a colleague from Panama.  She attended a session sponsored by Human Life International where organizers handed out rubber fetus dolls in peach and brown tones, holding up the latter and crying out cheerfully that they had "chocolate ones for the Africans!" Honestly, you couldn't make up something this patently bizarre and offensive. 

The titles of two of the parallel events I attended, "Breast Cancer Risk Reduction," and "Link Between Mental Health and Reproductive Issues" indicated that they would be addressing separate issues, but the core message was the same: abortion destroys women's lives.   

The "Breast Cancer Risk Reduction" session featured Angela LaFranchi, a breast cancer surgeon and Clinical Assistant Professor of surgery at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School who believes that terminating or deferring a pregnancy heightened a woman's risk of breast cancer.  She cited that a woman who gave birth at age 18 to a child carried full term had 50-75% less risk of developing breast cancer than a woman who did so at age 30. She then claimed that a woman who terminated her pregnancy before it was carried to full term actually had an increased risk of developing breast cancer, and women who had had multiple abortions faced even higher risk.  She even expressed her hope that attendees could counsel a teenager to carry a pregnancy, even an unwanted one, in order to prevent breast cancer!  When she closed by stating that the difference between having an abortion and carrying a child to term was the difference between "dead and dismembered or intact and alive," whatever credibility she had left went out the window. 

The "Link Between Mental Health and Reproductive Issues" session featured stories from several women about the immense pain and trauma they experience as a result of their decision to have an abortion. Many spoke of being pressured by family or partners to have an abortion against their will, and counseled against having an abortion for any reason.  There is no question that the entire session was designed as a scare tactic to deter women from exercising their own choices based on their conscience. 

These sessions left me with no doubt that abortion remains one of the most contested issues in the arena of sexual and reproductive health and rights, and that it is one the right wing will continue to harp on.  We must remember, however, that there are almost as many experiences, concerns and issues surrounding abortion as there are women and men in the world.  Ultimately, the extreme right wing refuses to see this mosaic of choice, value, and autonomy and sees only a black and white world of right and wrong.  It is this moral absolutism that disturbs me most. 
Post a comment
Write a comment:

Related Searches