Watchfully Scrutinize The Calorie Guidance Of Any Diet Program
Posted Jan 14 2009 6:06pm
Cautiously scrutinize the calorie recommendations of any diet program before you start it. You’ll perhaps discover that 95% of them have you cut your calories to “starvation” levels. Any diet program that’s very low in calories will cause weight loss in the beginning – but it will never work for long period. You see, the human body is very “smart” - it always strives to keep a magnificent state of equilibrium: Metabolism, body temperature, blood sugar, hormone ranks, acid-alkaline balance and each other system in the body, are any thing regulated within a narrow range that your body finds safe and comfortable how to lose weight.
When you subject yourself to extreme measures in an attempt to create sudden changes such as rapid weight loss, your metabolism cybernetically corrects itself to preserve equilibrium in energy balance, much the same way as a thermostat maintains the temperature of your home within a wanted array. As soon as you’re in danger of starving, your body will rapidly adjust your metabolic rate downward like a thermostat, so you burn fewer calories. This is frequently referred to as “the starvation response.” The single way to lose fat and keep it off permanently is to decrease your calories slightly and raise your activity greatly. It’s always better to burn the fat than try to starve the fat.
Most magazine publishers own supplement companies and employ their magazines as the main means for promoting their products. Certain well-known magazines have been doing this for decades. One day, it dawned on the rest of them that more money could be gained selling supplements than selling promotion or subscriptions. Before long, each publisher jumped on the bandwagon and ran supplement companies. You see, magazines have mega-credibility. Finally, they can’t print a lie right there on paper, can they? If its in print, it must be true, right? They’d get in some kind of trouble with an “alphabet agency” or else, wouldn’t they? Maybe. Maybe not.
Editorials are more lose pounds credible than promotion (that’s why they try to make ads look so much similar to articles these days). Most people will believe almost anything if it’s printed in a “reputable” medium such as a countrywide circulated magazine. That’s why magazines are the ideal vehicles for promoting supplements. Did you ever see how many magazine articles are about the latest, greatest “breakthroughs” in supplements? These “articles” aren’t truly articles at all; they’re nothing more than advertisements in disguise! (With an 800 number for trouble-free ordering at the end… how well-situated!). Even if a magazine doesn’t have a vested interest in a supplement line, you still can’t count on them to expose the whole truth to you because they don’t want to offend the deep-pocketed companies that are spending big money to advertise.
A full-page ad in a high circulation nationwide magazine can cost tens of thousands of dollars. With this kind of money at stake, do you think any magazine will print an article stating “supplements don’t work” and on the next page, run an ad for the equal supplements they are criticizing? Not probable is it? It’s in the magazine’s best interest to promote supplements like crazy, apart from of whether they work or not, because the more supplements that are sold, the more the supplement companies will support. The more they advertise, the more supplements they sell, and on and on the cycle goes.
This is the same reason you normally get better investing opinion from the smaller, lesser-known monetary newsletters than you do from the prime financial magazines and newspapers; because the major publishers don’t want to write editorials that will offend the advertisers. Don’t believe everything you read. Question all. Use your head. Use common sense and your own good judgment. Be careful of hidden motives. Just because it’s right there in black and white doesn’t mean it’s the reality. If it sounds too good to be true…it probably is.