Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page: Email Digg del.icio.us Reddit icon StumbleUpon Technorati
Go
Search posts:

Roman M.'s Twitter Updates

Video: Danny Cahill Biggest Loser winner season 8 http://bit.ly/6NJO59 1 day ago
Who has the best abs in the sports biz 2009?: The women http://bit.ly/4zjL8R 1 day ago
Ironman Western Australia to be held at least until 2014 http://bit.ly/8VGHp6 1 day ago
Only ten days left to submit your favorite endurance Blog of 2009 http://bit.ly/6tV4bX 1 day ago
Just in time for the holidays: and the ten most expensive bikes in the world are... http://bit.ly/7CE5hU 1 day ago
 

Running (not strength training) is better at building bones study finds

Posted Mar 03 2009 2:06pm

536097_lowRUNNER-LEGS An estimated 200 million people each year are effected by Osteoporosis.

So it may come as a surprise to some that new research study by University of Missouri researchers shows that running, rather than weight training, may actually be better at building and preserving bones.

“The results of the study confirm that both resistance training and high-impact endurance activities increase bone mineral density. However, high-impact sports, like running, appear to have a greater beneficial effect,” said Pam Hinton, associate professor in the Department of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology in the MU College of Human Environmental Sciences.

According to Science Daily, "People who primarily perform non weight-bearing activities will benefit from resistance training that increases lean body mass, Hinton said. People who engage in activities, such as cycling, swimming, or rowing, should add bone-strengthening activities, such as resistance training or running, to their exercise regimens."

In the study the researchers the researchers found that runners had greater spine done density than cyclists---therefore, high-impact activity may override the benefits of lean body mass on bone density, Hinton said.



Post a comment
Write a comment: