Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page:
Go
Search posts:

A horrible 3G mobile mast is due...

Posted Aug 26 2008 10:56am

mobilemast001 (600 x 483).jpg

A horrible 3G mobile mast is due to be erected near my home in March. Lots of us sent objection letters some while back of course but they were ignored of course. Last time i lived near a mobile mast i was so ill with a combination of symptoms that i could not understand that i was going to the doctor saying i thought i had parasites. Then i met my local mast activist and she gave me a list of typical symptoms of people living near a mast and i had a near complete match. I moved and was recovering within a week. Now what to do?????? I cannot live near one of these things but moving is such a big thing. But it’s my and my children’s health. And if we move, what about the poeple who move into my house? And my neighbours?

This report says there is going to be a ‘green audit’ if/when it goes up and apparently just the threat of this can be enough to get the mast relocated before it is even activated. We’ll have to see what happens. This is the closest i’ve got to swearing on this website.

I have recently adopted a policy of ‘no ring mobiles’. I’ve had to apologise to friends with mobiles that i can no longer afford to ring them - landlines only!

I am convinced that if people understood what mobiles did to them they simply could not use them except in an urgent situation. I can feel their energy yards off. It feels like a death ray through my head. It’s not that they are affecting me more, or that i have supernatural powers - it’s just that through diet and lifestyle choices my sensing equipment has become more highly tuned to notice the effects of many things.

If you need to be convinced intellectually read the following report by Dr Mercola. Anyway the mobile agenda is nothing to do with our convenience - it’s just a control grid that they managed to get us to pay for (including when we ring others’ mobiles - one reason i’ve stopped ringing them - i don’t own one).

Cell Phones Can Literally Kill You!

cell phone, radio waves, cell phone dangers, RF, EMF, radio waves, hand holding cell phoneA 33-year-old Korean man was found dead on November 28, apparently killed by a cell phone battery explosion. The cell phone was made by LG Electronics.

The man, identified only by his family name, Sur, was found dead by his co-workers at a quarry in North Chungcheong Province where he was employed as a shovel operator.

According to the co-worker who found him, “He had a mobile phone with a melted battery in his left shirt pocket. His shirt had soot on it in the shape of the phone.”

Professor Kim Hoon at Chungbuk National University, who examined the body, attributed the death to a phone battery explosion.” He was injured in the left side of his chest. His ribs and spine were broken. The explosion punctured his heart and lungs, leading to his death,” Kim said.

Sources:

* Telecoms Korea News Service November 28, 2007

Dr. Mercola’s Comments:

As you likely know, a greater risk from cell phones is the electromagnetic radiation they produce. I warned of these dangers on my Today Show interview last month, but NBC censored me and edited out all but 5 seconds of their 20 minute interview with me. Information carrying radio waves are dramatically increasing over the last few years as the number of cell phones have more than doubled. You are also receiving massive exposure from wireless Internet routers, whether you use them or not. Nearly every major office building is loaded with them, including Starbuck’s, Panera Bread, and most libraries.

When you combine all these information carrying radio waves they resonate with cellular receptors and cause serious disruption of your intercellular microtubular connections. Once this body communication system is damaged, it is very easy to develop all sorts of pathologies related to disrupted intracellular antioxidant systems and heavy metal toxicities.

No “Magic” Fixes

Some individuals believe that relatively expensive fixes like nano polymers (like those used by BioPro) can help with this, but my initial investigation strongly suggests that this technology protection is minimally effective, and dissipates rapidly.

The only real solution is to move our culture away from wireless back to more wired.

I purchased a home last year and spent the past year renovating it before I moved in last week. Part of the project was to put in wired CAT-5 cables so I have no wireless connections at all.

I also learned that most portable phones are a major source of these information carrying radio waves. The only exception would be the much older, essentially antiquated 900 MHz portable phones. Fortunately they are still readily available online. One of the major differences is that they are only on when in use. The other higher MHz phones are on continuously, bombarding your cells with tissue damaging radiation even when you’re not using them.

PR and Media Experts Know Cell Phone Dangers are Being Censored

Why don’t you know about this? Well, for the very same reasons that the public was deceived about tobacco. These large corporate interests were very effective at manipulating the media and legislation to perpetuate the myth of the safety of smoking.

We really need to learn from history, for if we fail to do so we will repeat the same mistakes. My belief is that this exponential increase in information radio waves is far more serious a threat than tobacco ever was.

Just as with tobacco a few years ago, there is so little mainstream media coverage of the dangers of electromagnetic- and radio frequency exposure that those who do speak out may seem like loonies on the fringe. But don’t be fooled by mainstream media silence.

Remember, the media outlets in the United States are owned by a minuscule SIX corporations, and even more importantly the telecommunication industry, which is even BIGGER than the drug cartel, Big Pharma, and they have far more influence than the drug companies.

Today, your mind is controlled by Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch’s News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, Viacom (formerly CBS) and General Electric’s NBC. These are the top owners of the entire media industry, which includes everything you read and hear in newspapers, magazines, TV and radio stations, books, records, movies, videos, wire services and photo agencies.

Edward Bernays (Sigmund Freud’s nephew) is still hailed as the “father of Public Relations” after his wildly successful marketing of the tobacco industry and public water fluoridation, among others. In the 2005 re-release of Propaganda, Bernays’ 1928 classic “PR bible” on shaping and manipulating public opinion, Mark Crispin Miller writes in his introduction:

“… the fact is that corporate propaganda squelches inconvenient journalistic enterprise, so that early warnings fail to resonate, and growing ills receive no mass attention.

As with the risks of smoking, so it has been, until very recently, with global warming, and so it is today with the carcinogenicity of cell phones, and the toxic side effects of fluoride, just to name a few under reported threats to public health.

In all such cases, the investigative journalist is the propagandist’s natural enemy, as the former serves the public interest, while the latter tends to work against it.”

It may be unfortunate, because it is not as convenient as turning on the television at night, but you simply cannot base your opinions on what is being published by these mass-media conglomerates. You have to find independent information – from people who do not have billions of dollars tied to the information being released – and I, for one, will continue digging for the truth, and bring these sources to you, through this newsletter and my website.

Post a comment
Write a comment:

Related Searches