Schizophrenia Commission not re-thinking schizophernia label
Posted Nov 11 2012 1:12pm
Louise Gillett writes about Rethink Mental Illness Members' Day and other matters in her most recent post. Status and the status quo, continue to be alive and well in England, like they are in so many other countries where official "commissions" are established to preserve the status quo. Shame, shame!
Here's an excerpt from Louise's blog, Schizophrenia at the Schoolgate I suffered a major disappointment yesterday - I learned that the Schizophrenia Commission have not recommended that the label be abolished or changed as I had hoped. (The report is not due to be published until next week but I feel no sense of loyalty that would prevent me from publishing this 'spoiler').
I was not actually surprised to find out that the label has not been changed - I suspected as much by the fact that after asking me to write a case study (of my own case) I was asked if I would mind if it was 'tweaked' to reflect the fact that some members of the Commission do not agree with my view of the damage done by the diagnosis of schizophrenia. After some thought I rejected my instinct towards compliance and wrote back to say that if they did use my case study I would prefer the wording left intact. They agreed to use the case study as I wrote it, and apparently it has been included in the report (although I think anonymously. I am not sure, I have not seen it, but one of the other Trustees who I spoke to yesterday dropped a big hint to this effect). Although of course, it might be removed after I have published this blog post!
So I had an inkling of what the outcome of this report would be - and it was confirmed as soon as I saw the title of Robin Murray's* talk at the meeting yesterday - 'What next for the Schizophrenia Commission?'
So the Schizophrenia Commission will continue - having already let down the people they are supposed to be helping.
I am staggered that they haven't effected the change. Robin Murray was questioned on the subject by a member of the audience and he couldn't produce a coherent reply - he stuttered and stumbled over the issue, saying there were differing views, even claiming that, 'The Schizophrenia Commission doesn't have the power to say one way or another' (really, Sir Robin?). Eventually he told us that although the diagnosis had been changed in some countries it wasn't going to happen here at the moment, but that maybe in a few years time, things would be different.
_________________________ Rossa's comment: Do we think this guy's going to change the system?