
Very tough question. My opinion is that the training philosophy and not the style is the most important consideration. An MMA school where you spar at varying levels up to at least occasional full contact, pressure testing your techniques against non-compliant opponents will be much more practical for self defense than a traditional school that does not do these things, regardless of how comprehensive the curriculum. So, I guess what I'm saying is that, in my opinion, it's more the school than the style.
Mark, MMA training can provide a lot of benefits with regards to partially preparing a person for real life self defense situations. The conditioning, learning what it feels like to train against a resisting opponent, and knowing how to defend yourself against strikes in a manner that is based on empiricism and not theory are all benefits of training MMA.
However, sport MMA only deals with learning how to "win" the ring. "Winning" on the street requires an entirely different mindset, tactical approach, and additional skill sets.
So, my advice is to find a good reality-based self defense school, and also to train a few days a week in a good MMA class, or take some Muay Thai and BJJ (taught at most MMA schools).
Good luck!
Mike Massie - Austin Self Defense Classes
Sport.
But if you still want to try out a MMA I recommmend the original MMA, Kaujukenbo.
Write a comment:
|
Posted by Mark C.
It seems mixed martial arts is all the rage now. While I appreciate the pragmatic approach of taking the best and most effective techniques from different styles, when I looked up a local MMA school it seems there is more emphasis on competition, and the obvious question in my mind is what about real world self defense situations? Does it depend on the school, or is MMA really considered another sport now?