OK this is going to be a long rant. I'm mad.
I am a regular contributor on
Allexperts.com , where people can write in about, well, anything, and ask an expert their question. I signed up as an expert in lupus. From the angle of living with it for 20 years and trying everything under the sun to deal with it. And some of it working quite well. But that's another post and not part of this rant.
What saddens me is the question I get the most often. It's not "I have lupus- now what?" or "Is there anything I change in my lifestyle to help reduce my need for medication? or "How do I keep my spirits up?" or "Hey Carla why are you so awesome?".... No, the question I get the most often (in various iterations) is... (have you guessed yet?)- "Why doesn't my doctor want to diagnose me with lupus?"
Now at the risk of sounding like a "back in my day" story... Back in my day, if you had a positive ANA test and 4 of the 11 classic lupus symptoms (see list here
http://tinyurl.com/3lwpa78 ), you got diagnosed with lupus. Of course this was after 2-5 years of schlepping around to various doctors being misdiagnosed before anyone even thought to look for lupus. But once they started looking for it, now all you had to do to qualify to join the fabulous club of lupies was have 4 symptoms and a positive ANA.
Not anymore. I guess the lupus club has too many members now, much like how academia has too many PhDs. Now they have to figure out a way to weed out candidates and discourage them (raise the minimum SAT score, take fewer candidates, jack up tuition, act like an ass so they don't want to stick around...). All in hopes that they either give up and go away (gee, also reminds me of applying for disability) or it takes them so long to finish their degree that you're already retired when they graduate.
Maybe the CDC has put a cap on how many new lupus cases are allowed a year, lest we have an epidemic reported (never mind that we have an
actual epidemic- just don't let it show up on paper!). Maybe doctors have been watching too many episodes of House "it's never lupus" MD and have started to believe it really isn't ever lupus. All I know is if you want a lupus diagnosis in 2011, you're in for an uphill battle. Oh yeah, on top of your uphill health battle. Because being sick is apparently not enough to have to deal with. Now you have to diagnose yourself then build a case and convince them to give you the diagnosis you went and figured out for yourself. And then pay them for the privilege.
I suppose one reason I was ultimately diagnosed with lupus, and very definitively, and despite the fact that I am also positive for Sjogren's, was that I had 10 of the 11 classic lupus symptoms, plus all 4 "bonus" symptoms. (here's the list again:
http://tinyurl.com/3lwpa78 ) I wish that story weren't so common. It's terrible how people suffer because they aren't listened to carefully enough.
20 years ago, when I got sick, not enough doctors would think to even look for lupus. Now it seems like they've all heard of it, but all they've heard is "it's never lupus- call it something else." I would love to get to the bottom of this trend. Why are they so resistant to giving a lupus diagnosis? Someone please tell me. I'm sure the answer will enrage me (even further), but I want to know.
It still happens even
after getting diagnosed- they want to un-diagnose you! I've been living with this for 20 years and still every time I see a new doctor, they don't believe that I have lupus- even when I bring them my 10 pounds' worth of old medical records. They run all the tests all over again. Seriously, they look at me accusing and and say "Who told you you had lupus?" I'm like, "You want the list alphabetically or chronologically?"
Why would I lie about such an annoying and socially disrespected disease? If I picked a disease I'd pick something that's not a punchline. But they have to run their tests and then march back in the next day and announce to me that I have lupus. Wow, how *ever* did you figure that out, you mad genius?
The current favorite substitute for a lupus diagnosis that I hear over and over from patients writing to me on
Allexperts.com is Sjogrens.
Being diagnosed with Sjogren's does NOT mean you don't have lupus. You can absolutely have both. I have Sjogren's and Lupus- and also Raynaud's. All 3 are autoimmune. Some say I have "secondary Sjogren's" - meaning the lupus is the primary disease. Whatever.
Let's break it down and cross-reference the symptoms lists. There is some overlap. Short break from rant while we insert lists.
Sjogren's syndrome symptoms include:dry eyes
dry mouth
joint pain or inflammation (arthritis)
Raynaud's phenomenon
lung inflammation
lymph node enlargement
kidney, nerve, and muscle disease
(from
http://www.medicinenet.com/sjogrens_syndrome/page2.htm#3whatare )
I am a regular contributor on Allexperts.com , where people can write in about, well, anything, and ask an expert their question. I signed up as an expert in lupus. From the angle of living with it for 20 years and trying everything under the sun to deal with it. And some of it working quite well. But that's another post and not part of this rant.
What saddens me is the question I get the most often. It's not "I have lupus- now what?" or "Is there anything I change in my lifestyle to help reduce my need for medication? or "How do I keep my spirits up?" or "Hey Carla why are you so awesome?".... No, the question I get the most often (in various iterations) is... (have you guessed yet?)- "Why doesn't my doctor want to diagnose me with lupus?"
Now at the risk of sounding like a "back in my day" story... Back in my day, if you had a positive ANA test and 4 of the 11 classic lupus symptoms (see list here http://tinyurl.com/3lwpa78 ), you got diagnosed with lupus. Of course this was after 2-5 years of schlepping around to various doctors being misdiagnosed before anyone even thought to look for lupus. But once they started looking for it, now all you had to do to qualify to join the fabulous club of lupies was have 4 symptoms and a positive ANA.
Not anymore. I guess the lupus club has too many members now, much like how academia has too many PhDs. Now they have to figure out a way to weed out candidates and discourage them (raise the minimum SAT score, take fewer candidates, jack up tuition, act like an ass so they don't want to stick around...). All in hopes that they either give up and go away (gee, also reminds me of applying for disability) or it takes them so long to finish their degree that you're already retired when they graduate.
Maybe the CDC has put a cap on how many new lupus cases are allowed a year, lest we have an epidemic reported (never mind that we have an actual epidemic- just don't let it show up on paper!). Maybe doctors have been watching too many episodes of House "it's never lupus" MD and have started to believe it really isn't ever lupus. All I know is if you want a lupus diagnosis in 2011, you're in for an uphill battle. Oh yeah, on top of your uphill health battle. Because being sick is apparently not enough to have to deal with. Now you have to diagnose yourself then build a case and convince them to give you the diagnosis you went and figured out for yourself. And then pay them for the privilege.
I suppose one reason I was ultimately diagnosed with lupus, and very definitively, and despite the fact that I am also positive for Sjogren's, was that I had 10 of the 11 classic lupus symptoms, plus all 4 "bonus" symptoms. (here's the list again: http://tinyurl.com/3lwpa78 )
I wish that story weren't so common. It's terrible how people suffer because they aren't listened to carefully enough.
20 years ago, when I got sick, not enough doctors would think to even look for lupus. Now it seems like they've all heard of it, but all they've heard is "it's never lupus- call it something else." I would love to get to the bottom of this trend. Why are they so resistant to giving a lupus diagnosis? Someone please tell me. I'm sure the answer will enrage me (even further), but I want to know.
It still happens even after getting diagnosed- they want to un-diagnose you! I've been living with this for 20 years and still every time I see a new doctor, they don't believe that I have lupus- even when I bring them my 10 pounds' worth of old medical records. They run all the tests all over again. Seriously, they look at me accusing and and say "Who told you you had lupus?" I'm like, "You want the list alphabetically or chronologically?"
Why would I lie about such an annoying and socially disrespected disease? If I picked a disease I'd pick something that's not a punchline. But they have to run their tests and then march back in the next day and announce to me that I have lupus. Wow, how *ever* did you figure that out, you mad genius?
The current favorite substitute for a lupus diagnosis that I hear over and over from patients writing to me on Allexperts.com is Sjogrens.
Being diagnosed with Sjogren's does NOT mean you don't have lupus. You can absolutely have both. I have Sjogren's and Lupus- and also Raynaud's. All 3 are autoimmune. Some say I have "secondary Sjogren's" - meaning the lupus is the primary disease. Whatever.
Let's break it down and cross-reference the symptoms lists. There is some overlap. Short break from rant while we insert lists.
Sjogren's syndrome symptoms include: