study published this month in Nutrition in which the authors dig deep into the dietary guidelines espoused by the US Departments of Agriculture and Health & Human Services along with reports promulgated by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and a third by the European Food Safety Authority. By now, we should all be familiar with the gist of their suggestions: consume less than 10% of calories from saturated fats by replacing them with mono- and polyunsaturated ones; and keep saturated fat intake as low as possible while consuming a nutritionally adequate diet.Along that vein of thought, I'd like to point out a
These now well known recommendations should be based upon controlled trials demonstrating that saturated fat consumption increases LDL (bad) cholesterol; saturated fat is associated with heart disease; and replacing saturated fat w/polyunsaturated fat decreases heart disease. In fact, in Table 1 of this review, the authors suggest that the evidence required above doesn't really support the guidelines. In Table 2, the authors dissect and compare the (overblown) recommendations presented by the IOM to the less impressive statistics published in specific studies.
I can already hear the conspiracy theorists out there mumbling & grumbling already. Is the USDA, DHHS & IOM trying to pull a fast one over us (again)? All I can recommend is that you take some time to read over this review and think long and hard about how to interpret the scientific literature for yourself. And then decide what you want to eat for dinner tonight.