So what did we learn from this study? Strict interpretation of the data tells us that 0.56mg of 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate, 3mg of pyridoxine hydrochloride, and 0.02mg of cyanocobalamin and/or 600mg of omega-3 fatty acids made no difference over 5yrs. But while this finding as stated is consistent w/other randomized controlled trials, they tell us nothing of what might happen from larger doses for longer periods of time. More importantly, we should consider if we're actually taking the proper supplements.
For instance, a good portion of the population is unable to convert 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate into L-methylfolate, the active form. And what of the conversion of pyridoxine into pyridoxal-5-phosphate, its active form? Likewise, cyanocobalamin vs methylcobalamin? In fact, while I do not shill for any pharmaceutical company or manufacturer of medical foods, I do know that there is at least one supplement composed of 3mg of L-methylfolate, 35mg of pyridoxal-5-phosphate, and 2mg of methylcobalamin. It seems to me that this would be the better, if not optimal, supplement to study.
And while 600mg of fish oil is better than none, consider that 4g (4,000mg) are indicated and approved by the Food & Drug Administration for those w/hypertriglyceridemia. In other words, much larger doses are used in other situations.
Don't get me wrong. I don't advocate taking one or more handfuls of pills every day. Instead, I recommend to my patients that we attempt to eat right in the first place and only consider supplementation if deemed necessary. So before you throw the baby out with the bath water when reading glib headlines and listening to 10 second sound bites, take the time to critically read the actual study.