Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page: Email Digg del.icio.us Reddit icon StumbleUpon Technorati
Go
Search posts:

Connie Bennett's Twitter Updates

I was supposed to be at the Natural Products Expo but unfortunately had deadlines at the last minute for my book,... http://t.co/jtFxxp5j 251 days ago
Do you know what the Glycemic Index is? How did you learn about it? How has it helped you? Please reply ASAP as I... http://t.co/dc0kOzfA 253 days ago
Good morning! Today is a fabulous new day! Today, thanks to the inspiration of Hay House, Movers & Shakers,... http://t.co/WdBWMcC9 253 days ago
Fascinating article. Do you eat GMO foods? http://t.co/XRqgwAdv http://t.co/ECruclp4 255 days ago
For what 3 things are you grateful? I'm so grateful that 1) I have the coolest VibesUP purple water bottle; 2)... http://t.co/cS8y6mws 255 days ago
 

Two More Consumer Groups Decry Splenda's Misleading Advertising

Posted Dec 18 2008 8:14pm

Are ads for the artificial sweetener Splenda--that use the slogan "made from sugar so it tastes like sugar"--deliberately misleading?

Yet two more consumer groups--the latest in a number who've questioned ads for the sweetener---believe that consumers are being deliberately deceived.

Consumer First and the California Alliance for Consumer Protection asked the California state attorney general late last month to investigate potentially misleading advertising practices by  McNeil Nutritionals, a division of Johnson & Johnson, that markets Splenda.

In particular, a letter from consumer advocate Michael Ross and Jim Conran of Consumers called into question a series of ads that replace the word "sugar" with the word "Splenda," as well as references to the "Splenda plum fairy," and "Splenda and spice and everything nice."

"We are concerned that this is a deliberate attempt on the part of the makers of Splenda to fool consumers into believing they are ingesting a natural product when in fact it is chlorine based," Ross and Conran wrote.

"A food product made through a chemical process using chlorine in a chemical plant can hardly be considered natural," they continued.

The letter also cites a national Internet survey conducted by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which found that nearly half of respondents wrongly believed that Splenda or the chemically created synthetic artificial sweetener is a natural product.

The two California groups are among a growing number of health and consumer advocates critical of Splenda's marketing tactics, including Generation Green, the Organic Consumers Association, Florida Consumers Action Network, the Texas Consumer Association and the sugar industry, which put up a www.truthaboutsplenda.com website.

Splenda, which is manufactured by the British company, Tate & Lyle, and marketed in the U.S. by Johnson & Johnson subsidiary McNeil Nutritionals, is made by a multi-step, patented chemical process that manipulates the molecular structure of sucrose through chlorination and other processes.

As I've noted previously, after chlorination, a chemical called phosgene is added. Phosgene is described by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as "a major industrial chemical used to make plastics and pesticides," and which, at room temperature, is a "poisonous gas."

In my opinion, before you use Splenda, it's important to review some of this recent information. From what I've read, I won't ever touch the substance. But I urge you find out for yourself.

Post a comment
Write a comment:

Related Searches