Even that information is scarce, consisting solely of calories, fat, fiber, and carbohydrates.
There is no mention of sodium or saturated fat.
And make sure to read the tiny print at the bottom of the page:
"Olive Garden has made an effort to provide complete and current nutrition information, but changes in recipes and the hand-crafted nature of our menu items mean that variations from these values can occur from time to time. Therefore, the values shown here should be considered approximations."
Nutrition information for their remaining menu items? Nonexistent.
"We do not provide nutritional information on other Applebee's® items - with approximately 1,900 locations in the U.S. alone there are many different vendors, which makes it extremely difficult to obtain nutritional information for our items."
I'm supposed to believe they can't tell me how many calories their three cheese chicken penne pasta bowl ("mozzarella, provolone and Parmesan cheeses top off a rich mix of penne pasta, Italian-seasoned grilled chicken, diced tomatoes, fresh basil and Alfredo sauce") provides?
Ironic, isn't it, how the main draw of all these restaurants is that no matter where in the country you go, their dishes are prepared identically , yet apparently when it comes to nutrition, each Applebee's is so unique that something as standard as caloric information varies from store to store?
Why doesn't this excuse apply to their Weight Watchers items?
I guess it wouldn't make them sound very trustworthy if they claimed, "Some items are Weight-Watchers friendly only in certain undisclosed cities."
Outback Steakhouse, meanwhile, beats around the bush.
"Order prepared without butter or BBQ sauce,order without the bacon and cheese,request with bun if your program allows,substitute baked potato, steamed vegetables, or steamed green beans."
The question remains -- how many calories do you get with the healthy substitutions? How many without?
Outback "answers" this question by tooting its own horn:
"We take pride in our "No Rules" approach to accommodating our customer's specific dietary needs."
In other words, "if we didn't give you people so much freedom when ordering, we would be able to provide nutrition information. Oh well!"
Then there's Wendy's. Well, at least the Wendy's in New York City.
Per the fast food chain's website:
"We regret that Wendy's cannot provide product calorie information to residents or customers in New York City. The New York City Department of Health passed a regulation requiring restaurants that already provide calorie information to post product calories on their menu boards -- using the same type size as the product listing.
We fully support the intent of this regulation; however, since most of our food is made-to-order, there isn't enough room on our existing menu boards to comply with the regulation.
To continue to provide caloric information to residents and customers of our New York City restaurants on our website and on our nutritional posters would subject us to this regulation. As a result, we will no longer provide caloric information to residents and customers of our New York City restaurants."
So because someone can ask for a burger without ketchup or extra bacon Wendy's can no longer offer nutrition information?
Odd -- that doesn't stop them from posting nutrition information on their website, or in their other restaurants across the country, where consumers have jus as much flexibility in ordering.
And how come they were able to provide caloric information in their New York City stores before the Department of Health ruling, despite custom ordering?
I also ask -- what about items like fries, sodas, frosties, and chicken nuggets, which are not made to order? They can't even offer that information in their New York City restaurants?
Mind you, Wendy's prides themselves in their "unrivaled [passion] for giving people what they want — and uncompromising in giving people what they deserve."
We all deserve to know what is in the food we're eating!
Many of these chains rely on the standard argument that listing nutritional information is useless because consumers don't go to their restaurants for nutrition.
Alright then, if that's the case, why not reveal the numbers? If it's not losing potential consumers that scares you, what's stopping you?