There seems to be a lot of focus on the state of Ketosis these days. With lots of folks asking the same questions Am I in Ketosis? How many carbs does it take to get thrown out of Ketosis? What should I do if the Ketostix aren't showing that I'm in Ketosis anymore, even though I'm only eating Induction level of carbs? Is it safe to stay in Ketosis indefinitely?
And while some of these questions are certainly important, like just how safe of a diet is this long-term, overall it seems that we are putting too much emphasis on the process of Ketosis and not enough emphasis on nutrition.
While I haven't read the new Atkins' book that came out earlier this month, due to personal financial reasons, what I've been reading on the web about it, and what folks who have purchased the book are saying about it, is fairly good. Like a long discussion and tips on realistic "good" fats intake, and no more recommending that one checks for the state of Ketosis with Ketostix.
Course, with so many different versions of Atkins out there, and people still doing all of them, I don't see the questions going away anytime soon. So I thought I'd take a moment and do a post on my own personal views about Ketosis.
Now, in the 70s, the whole Atkins' diet was built up around the idea of Ketosis. And like everyone else, I rushed out to the drug store and bought myself a bottle of Ketone testing strips -- Ketostix, because that's what they were called back then.
They were actually for diabetics who needed to test for the presence of Ketoacidosis. So those are the type of Ketones one is actually looking for when they test. The Ketones that prove a Diabetic is in trouble. They don't test for the state of dietary Ketosis, because that is actually measured by Ketones in the blood. But at the time, Dr. Atkins felt that Ketostix were an accurate enough test of the presence of Ketones to put his "Revolution" in regards to diets into play.
Since then, we've discovered that they aren't all that accurate of a measure. When I went on Atkins for the first time, I registered dark purple irregardless of how much water I drank. When I went on Atkins again, the color was somewhat lighter, but still moderate. Each time I returned to Atkins, the strips grew lighter and lighter, until today...I don't register on the sticks at all, even when doing Induction.
So in my opinion, they're pretty much worthless. And was very glad to see them no longer recommended because they only serve to confuse folks. That's because you can be in Ketosis without turning the sticks any type of color. You can register dark purple on the sticks, yet still not be burning body fat. In fact, those types of things occur irregardless of the number of carbs one is eating too. There's NO standard. Everything is individual. Everything depends upon one's own circumstances, goals, and metabolic damage.
And here's the clincher. You don't even have to be in Ketosis to mobilize your body fat stores!
The original IDEA was supposed to be about "Insulin." Lowering our basal levels back to normal, so that the doors to our body fat stores stay open. So that there's no possible metabolic interference with mobilizing our body fat stores for energy. So that we avoid all of the pitfalls and health consequences associated with Insulinemia and Insulin Resistance. But that isn't the only pathway. It's just one of many.
Somewhere along the way, things got a bit tilted. Somewhere along the way people started thinking that low-carb meant some kind of free-for-all. Stay in Ketosis and you can eat all you want, whenever you want, and whatever you want. Including lots of high-calorie, fatty foods. Stay in Ketosis and your body fat stores, irregardless of the amount of calories you eat, will just fall off of you. Because carbs are the demon, not calories. Stay in Ketosis, and you'll experience Atkins Magic: no hunger, easy fat loss, and permanent goal weight.
Promises that didn't exactly deliver to most of us.
The problem, as I see it, isn't with the Atkins' diet per se, it's with us. We read the book cover to cover, but only saw and retained what we wanted to see and remember. We didn't think about how it was structured, the different phases and steps we were supposed to move along with, because afterall, Dr. Atkins did say that if you have a lot of weight to lose, it was okay to do an extended Induction.
Okay. An extended Induction. With extended being the key word here. Now we totally loved the idea of faster weight loss, faster fat loss, and we embraced the idea of doing a very low carb diet because we are totally into FAST.
What we failed to understand (and this happened in the latter 90s as well as it does today), is that an extended Induction does something to the metabolism. I don't know what that is exactly, it could be a thyroid issue, it could be a total body metabolic issue, a metabolic adaption so-to-speak, but I watched people do it to themselves in 1999, and I've watched people do it to themselves today.
Whatever carb level you chose for the better part of your "diet" phase, is pretty much the carb level you've sealed yourself into living with for the rest of your lives.
Did you get that?
The original Atkins diet, and even all of his later versions were never meant to keep you in Ketosis forever. They really weren't. They were designed to get you into Ketosis initially, where hunger and cravings could be controlled long enough to teach you how to add more carbs to your diet slowly, so that you could learn your own personal tolerance for carbohydrate -- and learn how to stay within that tolerance.
What most people did instead, was stick to Induction level of carbs for faster weight loss, or just barely above that, and stayed there for so long that their bodies literally adapted to that carb level. Created a new set point for carbs. So now when they try to up their carbs, even after the week or so required to upregulate the enzymes needed to process those carbs, they can't do it without replacing the body fat they've lost at lower carb levels.
In a very real sense, people who didn't NEED to stay at those reduced levels of carbs literally screwed themselves out of a more moderate maintenance diet -- all in the name of faster fat loss.
So we really need to THINK about what we're doing to ourselves. Right Now. Before it's too late. Because the idea wasn't to stay in Ketosis forever. Although that's what a lot of folks are going to have to do now, even though we do not know how safe that is going to be long-term, due to the way in which they chose to rid themselves of most of their body fat.
Are we using the state of Ketosis as it was originally intended, a tool to help us learn our own personal tolerance level for carbs, (whatever that level may be, and for some of us that can be quite high), or are we using the state of Ketosis as a CRUTCH because we have convinced ourselves that the demon in our lives, the thing outside of ourselves that made us fat -- was carbohydrates?