Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page: Email Digg del.icio.us Reddit icon StumbleUpon Technorati
Go
Search posts:

The Practice of Medicine

Posted Oct 03 2008 11:32am

In her book, How Doctors Think, Kathryn Montgomery analyzes clinical judgment and the practice of medicine. Montgomery is an erudite who develops her thesis thoroughly, with wonderful prose, to argue the following: 

Two and half millennia of scientific discovery - including the advances of the last two and half decades - have not altered medicine's practical rationality. No matter how solid the science or how precise the technology that physicians use, clinical medicine remains an interpretive practice. Medicine's success relies on the physicians' capacity for clinical judgment. It is neither a science nor a technical skill (although it puts both to use) but the ability to work out how general rules - scientific principles, clinical guidelines - apply to one particular patient. This is - to use Aristotle's word - phronesis, or practical reasoning. It enables physicians to combine scientific information, clinical skills, and collective experience with similar patients to make sense of the particulars of one patient's illness and to determine the best action to take to cure or alleviate it. 

Clearly, phronesis relies on a unique notion of causality: causality in medicine is often murky, from a scientific perspective (is a patient's headache caused by over contracting blood vessels or poor diet or irregular sleep patterns, for instance), but this underlying biochemical cause need not be identified specifically in order to care for a patient successfully. All that matters is finding a way to alleviate a patient's illness and restore, maintain, or enhance her health. The practice of medicine is practical: the goal is to relieve suffering and rejuvenate people so that they can get back to living their lives (or move on with their lives, in the case of death and dying). 

If epistemology, causation, uncertainty, the limits of knowledge, and the nature of medicine interest you, I highly recommend Montgomery's wonderful book. Like Taleb's The Black Swan, Montgomery's analysis of thinking in medicine reflects extensive thought, study, and erudition, so her book serves as a platform for further inquiries into this fascinating field. 

Finally, I have gained interest in the analogies between the practice of medicine and intelligence analysis. On the New Risks' Weblog (thanks to a lead from my good friend Brian Geremia; read here ), Linda Popova discusses this analogy and analyzes a splendid paper, "Improving Intelligence Analysis by Looking to the Medical Profession" ( click here to read ). Clearly, there exist many parallels and similarities between these two crafts that deal with real-world uncertainty every day with dramatic consequences. Peruse this paper and Popova's blog for now; I look forward to expounding upon this area of inquiry in the near future.
Post a comment
Write a comment:

Related Searches