Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page: Email Digg del.icio.us Reddit icon StumbleUpon Technorati
Go
Search posts:

Michelle Lin's Twitter Updates

@precordialthump I totally forgot about the EKG library! Awesome stuff. Keep up the great work (when do you sleep?!) 259 days ago
@emeducation Perfect, thanks for the suggestions! Turns out one is co-authored by Jeff Tabas. He already gave them all books. 259 days ago
Recommendations for an EKG resource to review bread & butter cases for senior residents? Pre-graduation panic setting in for our residents. 259 days ago
@danipedia Good point. I use the studies to convince the trauma consults NOT to get c-spine imaging on EVERYONE (citing distracting injury)! 264 days ago
@doctorflash Hi there. Just wanted to drop a note to thank you for all the extra traffic you're sending to blog. Much appreciated!! 275 days ago
 

Paucis Verbis: Distracting injuries in c-spine injuries

Posted Sep 09 2011 12:00am

"Distracting injury" is a frequent cited reason for imaging the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients, per the NEXUS study . In the Journal of Trauma in 2005 and 2011, studies aimed to narrow the definition of "distracting injury". Although both are studies at different sites, both conclude the same
  • Chest injuries may be considered "distracting injuries" because of their proximity to the cervical spine.  
So let's say you are caring for a non-intoxicated motor vehicle crash patient with an isolated tibia fracture (i.e. a "long bone fracture"), no chest injuries, and no neck pain/tenderness. Per the NEXUS criteria, you might consider this patient to have a "distracting injury" because of the long bone fracture. Instead, the literature now supports your clinically clearing the cervical spine without imaging.


Wait, let's rethink this. Does this mean that you should get cervical spine imaging for ALL blunt trauma patients with ANY chest wall tenderness?! NO. That's just crazy. You should still factor in the mechanism of injury, severity of pain, and your clinical gestalt.

So for me, these "distracting injury" studies are helpful such that
  • If your trauma patient does NOT have chest trauma, it may help you avoid unnecessary cervical spine imaging, as suggested by the NEXUS criteria.
  • If your trauma patient DOES have significant chest trauma, I have a lower threshold to obtain cervical spine imaging despite the neck being non-tender.




You can download this PV card:  [ MS Word ] [ PDF ] See  other Paucis Verbis cards .

Post a comment
Write a comment: