Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page: Email Digg del.icio.us Reddit icon StumbleUpon Technorati
Go
Search posts:

Michelle Lin's Twitter Updates

@precordialthump I totally forgot about the EKG library! Awesome stuff. Keep up the great work (when do you sleep?!) 259 days ago
@emeducation Perfect, thanks for the suggestions! Turns out one is co-authored by Jeff Tabas. He already gave them all books. 259 days ago
Recommendations for an EKG resource to review bread & butter cases for senior residents? Pre-graduation panic setting in for our residents. 259 days ago
@danipedia Good point. I use the studies to convince the trauma consults NOT to get c-spine imaging on EVERYONE (citing distracting injury)! 264 days ago
@doctorflash Hi there. Just wanted to drop a note to thank you for all the extra traffic you're sending to blog. Much appreciated!! 275 days ago
 

Paucis Verbis card: Cervical spine imaging

Posted Dec 10 2010 12:00am
There is constant debate on whether to image the cervical spine of blunt trauma patients. Fortunately, there are two clinical decision tools available to help you with your evidence-based practice.

The NEXUS and Canadian C-spine Rules (CCR) are both validated studies which both quote a high sensitivity (over 99%) in detecting clinically significant cervical spine fractures. Both studies primarily used plain films in evaluating their patients.

                                  Sensitivity        Specificity
    NEXUS study            99.6%           12.6%
    CCR Study                 99.4%           45.1%

NEXUS
National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study

A patient’s neck can be clinically cleared safely without radiographic imaging if all five low-risk conditions are met
  1. No posterior midline neck pain or tenderness
  2. No focal neurological deficit
  3. Normal level of alertness
  4. No evidence of intoxication 
  5. No clinically apparent, painful distracting injury*
* Defined as “a condition thought by the clinician to be producing pain sufficient to distract the patients from a second (neck) injury. Examples may include, but are not limited to the following
  1. Long bone fracture,
  2. A visceral injury requiring surgical consultation,
  3. A large laceration, degloving injury, or crush injury,
  4. Large burns, or
  5. Any other injury producing acute functional impairment
Physicians may also classify any injury as distracting if it is thought to have the potential to impair the patient’s ability to appreciate other injuries.”

Canadian C-spine Rules (CCR)
The basic approach in this flow-chart is to (1) make sure that the patient meets the same inclusion criteria as in the CCR study. Then (2) determine if there are high-risk findings. If so, go directly to imaging. (3) If there are no high-risk findings, check to see if the patient qualifies as a low-risk candidate where you might be able to clinically clear the c-spine without imaging. (4) If the patient is neither high or low risk, then the patient is moderate risk and requires imaging. Here's a flow chart that I made to help you remember:

(click to enlarge)

Note: Many emergency physicians go straight to CT imaging for patients with neck tenderness and moderate/high risk findings.

I personally rarely use the CCR algorithm because I can rarely remember all of the criteria. NEXUS is nice because of its simplicity. Where the CCR algorithm IS helpful is in clinical clearance of the low-risk patient with neck pain. I've cleared many patients who self-present with a whiplash mechanism (simple rear-end motor vehicle crash) and diffuse neck pain. By NEXUS criteria, you'd have to image them because they have neck tenderness. By CCR criteria, if they can actively rotate their neck 45 degrees left and right, they don't have a clinically significant c-spine injury. No imaging needed.


Feel free to download this card and print on a 4'' x 6'' index card.

[ MS Word ] [ PDF ]
Post a comment
Write a comment:

Related Searches