Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page:
Search posts:

Health Care Costs Are In Tight Control

Posted Dec 16 2011 7:25pm

Economist Robert Samuelson has declared that health care costs are “out of control.” Though one hesitates to disagree with a widely syndicated columnist, Samuelson is 180 degrees wrong.   Health care costs are IN control – very tight control – by Washington.

Health care as two words refers to goods and services delivered by hospitals and providers to be consumed by patients. The word costs, when referring to what providers and institutions must pay, is determined primarily by government regulation and bureaucracy rather than by labor costs, supplies, or MRI machines. Payments to providers and institutions –what the government calls costs – are predetermined by the government. The bill submitted by a provider is generally irrelevant.

Whether you describe excessive national expenditure of money as costs or as payments (reimbursements), spending is strictly controlled by the government. It is not “out of control” at all.

Note first that when the PPAHCA (“Obamacare”) reduced Medicare “costs” by 21%, they cut Medicare payments (to providers). Therefore, they cut services to patients. As Robert Moffit of the Heritage Foundation testified before Congress, “you cannot get more of something by paying less for it.”

Meanwhile, PPAHCA increased spending ON – the costs OF – the federal healthcare bureaucracy by six whole new agencies, hundreds (? thousands) of bureaucrats added to the payrolls, and multi-thousands of new rules and regulations. So the government controls and increases spending to/on itself , while it controls and decreases spending on patients.

Need proof? Of all the money spent on “healthcare” in 2010, 40% – that is over $1 trillion – …disappeared. It went in to healthcare but provided no health care. That statistic was before PPAHCA, which could raise the disappearing dollars to half (!) of all healthcare spending.

Samuelson goes on to use the recent OECD (Office for Economic Cooperation and Development) report to explain U.S. overspending: steep prices and abundant provision of expensive services. Hogwash! As Dr. Samuelson knows, “price” is meaningless in healthcare in terms of what gets paid.

As a doctor, I can charge whatever I like for doing a cardiac catheterization in a baby. The actual bill can read $2000, $4000, and sometimes over $5000. Regardless of what you call my price, charge, or bill, I get $387. That is what the government pays. So the price may seem steep but the payment is peanuts.

For Medicare, just as for my caths, payments are now lower than the cost-of-doing-business. So if you want to know your Medicare doctor can no longer see you and is not accepting new patients, it is because she gets paid less by Medicare than her costs to keep the office doors open.

How much of healthcare spending is for administration and regulations ? No one knows because no one measures. Government administration guesses at how much it directly pays itself, and conveniently ignores the costs – to providers and the public – of the ever-expanding mountain of regulations.

Samuelson rightly asserts that, “the system needs a fundamental overhaul to deliver more value for money.” No one disagrees…except those in charge. In order to determine value, one must measure cost, measure benefit, and compare the two. Does the government measure either the benefits of health care or the benefits of healthcare? The answer is a resounding No!

So how can you-the-consumer, whom I call We The Patients, assess value? If you only know part of the numerator and none of the denominator of a cost/benefit ratio, you can’t.

Finally, Professor Samuelson practices really bad medicine … on healthcare. He jumps directly from symptom identification (overspending) to treatment plans (vouchers or single payer) without going through the critical step of root cause analysis.

If you want to cure anything, whether it is a sick person or a sick system, you must treat the cause(s) of illness. Overspending is only one part of the sickness in healthcare. If we try to fix it without resolving its root cause as well as the other causes of illness in the system, we are certain to fail, just as Obamacare – with its expanded control – is certain to make healthcare, We The Patients, and America sicker.

Post a comment
Write a comment:

Related Searches