Health knowledge made personal
Specialty: Emergency Medicine
Diagnostic tests: Asking the right questions
Posted Sep 06 2012 12:00am
You have picked up the next chart and have drawn your differential diagnosis based on the patient's demographic, chief complaint, and vital signs.
Pattern Recognition vs Probabilistic Diagnostic Reasoning2:
Pattern Recognition
See it and recognize disorder
⇓
Compare post-test probability with threshold (usually pattern recognition implies near 100% and so above threshold)
|
Probabilistic Diagnostic Reasoning
Clinical assessment generates pretest probability
⇓
New information generates post-test probability (may be iterative)
⇓
Compare post-test probability with threshold
You can approach diagnosing diseases by using either of these two patterns or a combination of both. Keep in mind these two methods can also complement each other. Pattern recognition is more of an intuitive approach, often referred to as System 1 thinking. It is much faster, heuristic. Probabilistic diagnostic reasoning may be referred as System 2 thinking, meaning it’s slower, but more analytical and systematic.
After you draw your differential diagnosis and before seeing the patient, you have a pretest probability of the diagnosis that ails the patient. After you obtain a focused history and physical exam, you have gathered information that will help you draw a more accurate post-test probability and narrow your differential diagnosis. The essence of being a doctor does not lie on the tests, therapies, signs, or symptoms, but on how you use them. Every sign and every symptom represents a diagnostic test.
Understanding statistical terms helps us interpret diagnostic test results.
Sensitivity:
- SnOUT: If a test has a high sensitivity and the elicited test is negative, you have essentially ruled OUT the disease.
- How accurately the test picks up patients WITH disease
Specificity:
- SpIN: If a test has a high specificity and the test is positive, you have essentially ruled IN the disease.
- How accurately the test picks up patients WITHOUT disease
As
you can see there are limitations when applying sensitivity and
specificity on patients since we don't know if the have the disease or
not. Predictive values have their limitations as well, these change with
prevalence. Therefore, a test used to detect disease in a population
with high prevalence would not be adequate in a population with low
prevalence. Keep in mind that tests should not be used to replace your
clinical judgement.
Prevalence:
- This is your pretest probability, used before you go into the room to see the patient.
Likelihood Ratio (LR):
- Compares results of patients with disease vs patients without disease
- More accurate than sensitivity and specificity
- Helps you derive the post-test probability
- Takes sensitivity and specificity into account simultaneously
- When LR >1 it means the probability of disease increases
- When LR <1 it means the probability of disease decreases
- When LR = 1, the probability of disease is unchanged
- Before ordering a test, eliciting a symptom, or finding a sign, ask yourself: How will the absence or presence of this factor change my post-test probability?
- Use the Fagan Nomogram to determine post-test probability.
Does the post-test probability drawn after your assessment change your threshold?
When the post-test probability falls between test threshold and treatment threshold, further investigation needs to be done. If it lies above the testing threshold it is encouraged to treat, but if it falls below the testing threshold, it is encouraged to pursue a different diagnosis.
Diagnostic and Test Threshold 7
There are three aspects that determine test and treatment thresholds:2
Properties of the test
The disease prognosis
The nature of the treatment
Changing testing thresholds
If
Then
Test: safe and less expensive
Disease: worse prognosis
Treatment: safe and effective
The LOWER the test threshold
Test: not as safe, more expensive
Disease: benign
Treatment: not safe or effective
The HIGHER the test threshold
Changing treatment thresholds
If
Then
Test: safe and less expensive
Disease: benign prognosis
Treatment: expensive and major adverse effects
The
HIGHER the treatment threshold
The characteristics require a higher diagnostic certainty so that we cause less harm from this treatment.
Test: less safe, more invasive than the treatment
Disease: worse prognosis
Treatment: safer than the test
The