Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE
President Obama is blinded by his ideology. His healthcare policy goal is to eventually have a single party payer system. Medical care will be commoditized with treatment decisions made by the central government.
It is a charade that his health insurance exchanges will lead to affordable private insurance. It is misguided to believe that a non-elected central committee (IPAB) will be tolerated to make treatment decisions for the population.
The larger pretense is that President Obama is building an inexpensive bureaucracy. Last week he again stated that government overhead for Medicare and Medicaid is very low. He again declared that the overhead expense is only 2½ percent.
It cost two and one half percent for the central government to outsource administrative services to the healthcare insurance industry. The healthcare insurance industry, in turn, charges the government 18-40% to administer the programs.
Everyone knows most everything government run is inefficient. President Obama is enlarging the scope of government in all areas at a time when government is too large and inefficient. The government’s income is $1 trillion dollars less than its expenses per year since he has been President.
President Obama thinks if he spends enough money he will spend his way out off the jam.
President Obama believes one way to become more efficient is to gather more data. He can then figure out which hospital systems and physicians are inefficient and penalize them.
This philosophy has two potential pitfalls. If the data is faulty the conclusions are wrong. The second pitfall is that penalties do not encourage cooperation and meaningful improvements.
“ Decision-making in healthcare can be painfully slow, as any physician will tell you . Hospital systems and physicians are being spurred on in part because healthcare is beginning to deal with a shift in reimbursement toward one that rewards quality and disincentives inefficiency and waste.
One problem is that quality is not clearly defined and is sometime false. The government must reexamine its premises.
Most hospitals and health systems have lots of data that might improve outcomes and cut waste.
The problem is getting that data, which is often unstructured, into a format that allows clinicians to make decisions faster and in a more coordinated fashion.
All of the innovation is happening without input from physicians. It is being done to decrease the cost of the hospitals. One thought would be to get rid of a few excess salaried, $750,000 a year hospital administrators and $2,000,0000 plus healthcare insurance company administrators which would go a long way to reduce the cost of healthcare coverage.
Instead the government is looking to penalize physicians. Physicians are the providers that deliver medical care.
There is software being developed that deals with real time processing of clinical data. The software can communicate those data to networked physicians instantly and help physicians deliver more timely care.
Many hospital systems are trying to install these real time systems. Unfortunately, many hospital administrators do not understand its power as a teaching tool to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of medical care.
The hospital systems’ only interest is in the financial result and the question of whether the huge investment is worth the capital expenditure.
Most physicians do not have an EMR and only 7% of physicians have a fully functioning EMR.In the monograph from “Pathways to Data Analytics” two things were very apparent. It looks like the healthcare insurance industry controls the committee and its plans is to continue to control the healthcare dollars and hope to control the healthcare data.
Increasingly, a data-driven approach to healthcare is necessary.
The complexity of clinical care requires it , says Glenn Crotty Jr., MD, FACP, executive vice president and chief operating officer at CaMC.
“We’re moving from an individual practitioner cottage industry to a team-based process now . . .. [Medical care] is beyond the capacity of any one individual to be expert enough to do that. So we have to do it in a team.”
A team requires information. The changing dynamics of healthcare spending and reimbursements also require data to navigate.
“Our analytics are not just for finance, which traditionally is what hospitals invested in,” says St. Luke’s Chief Quality Officer Donna Sabol , MSN, RN. “When you look at how [hospital] payment is changing [to] a value-based equation, you have to have good analytics for finance and for quality.”
Absent from the report is the patient and his/her responsibility to the therapeutic unit. Until some policy maker understands the role of patients to the therapeutic unit they will get nowhere in improving the healthcare system.
A glaring example is the money spent by hospital systems to improve the discharge process to avoid re-hospitalization within the 30 days post discharge.
Obamacare has instituted the rule November1,2012 that if a patient is re-hospitalized within 30 days of the initial hospitalization the hospital system will not get paid.
I can think of 5 ways hospital systems can get around this rule without suffering the penalty.
None-the-less the hospital systems are buying software to study and automate the process to avoid re-hospitalization using its clinical data in real time.
The Seton Hospital System in Austin Texas might have figured it partially out.
It started what it calls an extensivist program. It is acting as an extension of its physicians care to help avoid re-hospitalization and use the best data it can collect.
Its is helping clinicians identify patients who
would benefit most from extra attention following discharge. The program
started with congestive heart failure patient
"It's taking the whole universe of
information we have and cutting out what's extraneous and giving clinicians the
information they need to make decisions."
He says, "you start connecting all those things together and you get a more complete picture of the patient as a person, rather than as a recipient of a bill," he says. "That's been the exciting thing recently. You realize that a patients' success or failure may not have to do with the care plan details or the clinical attributes of the patient as much as the social attributes."
Physicians outside the hospital work with a team of social workers, nurses, and others to visit patient homes and figure out what's keeping a patient from effectively following treatment protocols that will likely keep them out of the hospital.
The software helps determine, based on a host of combined data, which patients are most likely to be re-hospitalized within 30 days. Targeting the patients is like looking into a crystal ball. The hospital system cannot afford to service all the patients with congestive heart failure. The program is in its early stages. If successful the plan is to expand it to diabetes and other chronic diseases.
This will happen well beyond November 2012 and January 1,2014. This hospital system finally realized that it can and must be an extension of its physicians’ care and not a competitor for patient care.
Missing is the patients responsibility and incentive in not being readmitted to the hospital. This can only be accomplished when consumers not only have a desire to be healthy they have a financial interest to stay healthy.
This can be accomplished in a consumer driven healthcare system where the patients are responsible for their health and own their healthcare dollars. The easiest way to get there is using my ideal medical savings accounts.
The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone