Health knowledge made personal
|
The article is summarized below:
Methodology:
Using brainstorming and a modified Delphi consensus technique, a focus group developed a Completed Clinical Evaluation Report Rating (CCERR) form. This form was then tested nationally and revised to yield a tool which evaluated 9-items each on a 5-point scale. This CCERR tool was found to be a reliable and valid means to differentiate superior from average from poor end-of-rotation evaluations.
The 9-item CCERR checklist:
How would your own Daily Evaluation Card evaluations fare?
Use a 5-point scale (1 = not at all, 3 = acceptable, 5 = exemplary).
Reference
Dudek NL, Marks MB, Wood TJ, Lee AC. Assessing the quality of supervisors' completed clinical evaluation reports. Med Educ. 2008 Aug;42(8):816-22.
|
Write a comment:
|
What I wondered was: how can I best use these DEC's to help learners progress as medical professionals and at the same time provide critical information for the PD’s?
Fortunately, I stumbled upon a 2008 Medical Education paper called “Assessing the quality of supervisors' completed clinical evaluation reports” by Dr. Nancy Dudek (University of Ottawa). This article was what I was looking for. Although this article was intended to evaluate the quality of the summative evaluation, the principles remain applicable to the DEC's.