Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page: Email Digg del.icio.us Reddit icon StumbleUpon Technorati
Go
Search posts:

Sierra Club ..'s Twitter Updates

Daily Roundup: December 2, 2009: Inked Activists: A U.K. art collective tattooed the images of endangered species o... http://bit.ly/6eR5Lv 4 days ago
Book Review Wednesday: Environmental History Books: Every Wednesday, we review a selection of new and upcoming book... http://bit.ly/5zyq4n 4 days ago
Daily Roundup: November 19, 2009: Watch This: The California Energy Commission approved the nation’s first energy... http://bit.ly/3kfVVb 17 days ago
@livenature You can sponsor a wild place without the stuffed animal too, if you like: http://bit.ly/sponsorwild 17 days ago
Buying Greener Gold: A new gold ring may dazzle, but its environmental history isn't very shiny. Many eco-minded peo... http://bit.ly/Eu5by 17 days ago
 

Slow Food Nation Thinkers

Posted Sep 01 2008 7:17pm

Marion Nestle, author of What to Eat and a professor of nutrition, food studies, and public health at NYU, lives in what she calls Junk Food City. More commonly known as Manhattan, the city has some competition for the title, but Nestle today used her experiences in the Big Apple to illustrate for attendees of a Slow Food Nation forum how she sees nutrition and public health connecting with waste and the environment.

In January, New York City passed legislation requiring all restaurants in the Big Apple to post calories on their menus. With full enforcement in effect since last month, Nestle knows that a blueberry-pomegranate smoothie sold on her street contains more than 1,100 calories, and a personal-sized pizza has more than 2,100 calories. Eat both, she said, and you've had more calories in one sitting than most people need in an entire day ( Michael Phelps excluded).

Here's where the environment comes in: Nestle noticed (and the Economist recently reported ) that when the calorie count became readily available, "it immediately stopped [many] restaurants from serving such large portions." That meant fewer calories per plate, she said, and less food going to waste.

Fellow panelist Andrew Kimbrell, founder and executive director of the nonprofit Center for Food Safety, said he would like to see more than nutrition labeling. "Food is the most intimate relationship we have with the environment," he said, citing labels for genetically-engineered or irradiated ingredients (approved by the FDA last week for lettuce and spinach) as information that would help consumers make more educated decisions about food. Meanwhile, forum moderator and Rodale Institute executive director Timothy LaSalle, said organic labels already signal foods produced with fewer negative effects on the climate: "Eating organic and regenerating our soil matters more than anything."

"Agriculture is at a bit of a cross roads in the face of global warming," said panelist A.G. Kawamura, Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture. "This is the vehicle that got us to today, but will it take us into the next century? Absolutely not."

Post a comment
Write a comment:

Related Searches