Provocative Book Presents Stark Reality for the Next 40 Years
Posted May 10 2012 12:35pm
Forty years ago Limits to Growth addressed the grand question of how humans would adapt to the physical limitations of planet Earth while in pursuit of limitless growth.
Next month, Chelsea Green will publish 2052 , a provocative new book that examines what our future will look like in the next forty years. Written by Jorgen Randers, one of the original authors of Limits, as well as its subsequent updates ( Beyond the Limits and Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update ), the book probes what the world will actually be like in forty years.
Guess what? It’s not looking good for humanity. That’s what happens when you ignore the warnings first issued in Limits. As in, you can’t push an economic model fueled by limitless profits and resources when, in fact, we live on a finite planet. Mix that in with dysfunctional democracies such as ours in the United States that are bought and sold by corporations who profit from our addiction to fossil fuels and the conflicts that erupt as a result (war, etc.)
Earlier this week, the Club of Rome which commissioned the original report that culminated in Limits to Growth as well as the report that has culminated in 2052 - presented the book’s key findings at the annual conference of the World Wildlife Fund.
In his introduction ( video linked here and embedded below ) to delivering some of the book’s key findings, Randers related the current work, and warnings, to those issued four decades ago.
“The big question at the outset, was: ‘Will the world overshoot and collapse?’ This was the warning that my friends and I made in 1972 in the Limits to Growth book where we basically said because of the decision delays in international governance systems, the world will be allowed to expand beyond its sustainable capacity, and then sooner or later it will be forced back down to sustainable territory and this will an unpleasant development. We are now forty years down the line and it is perfectly obvious that world has already overshot. At the time, in 1972, our critics said that human society is not going to be so stupid as to let the world move into non-sustainable territory. Well, we now are in unsustainable territory.”
The book challenges the US-dominated belief that we can continue to tap the planet’s limited resources to fuel unlimited growth. In fact, the ecological footprint created by this type of economic activity is likely to do just the opposite.
In short, the US will see a general stagnation of growth for decades to come because our dysfunctional democracy which bends to the needs of the private market rather than the social good hinders us from focusing on solutions. I mean, let’s face it members of Congress, media pundits, and even the current administration continue to talk up the need to increase our dependence on fossil fuels by drilling in the Arctic, boosting domestic oil production, or allowing tar sands to be imported from Canada.
Already critics are crying foul this is some grand socialist, environmental whacko experiment to enslave us all to some UN colony. For some critics, Randers isn’t alarmist enough and they believe he is underestimating how quickly the planet will heat up, and the consequences of it including poverty, famine and increasingly low birth rates as more families are forced to choose between survival and bringing new lives into the world.
Below is a video from Randers’ presentation at the WWF forum. Watch and determine for yourself whether you believe Randers is over, or under, estimating what could happen in the future.
Keep in mind as you listen: One of the original schematics laid out in Limits to Growth rapid growth followed by what is called “overshoot” of resources and then a decline has largely played out as predicted as this Smithsonian article demonstrates.
With such potentially depressing news, it’s nice to see the younger generation taking up the call to arms and suing their elders for screwing up things to badly . Maybe there is hope that change can be forced more rapidly than our failing democratic systems allow.