Prescription for Bias – The Media’s Anti-Pharma Jihad
Posted Oct 28 2008 9:57pm
It won’t come as a surprise to anyone that there is an incredible anti-pharmaceutical bias in the media. However, the Business & Media Institute’s new report documents and quantifies this bias. In its new report, “ Prescription for Bias,” the conservative think-tank demonstrates the considerable anti-pharmaceutical attitude in broadcast media.
“Prescription for Bias” looks at network broadcast coverage during the first three quarters of 2006. The report found that 80% of the stories offer a distorted or slanted view of the industry through completely excluding the viewpoint of the industry. In only 22% of the media stories was the name of the company who invented the new drug therapy even mentioned.
Usually when a group with a strong viewpoint puts out a report like this, it’s pretty easy to punch holes in the logic. However, the methodology is strong and I’m impressed with how this one stands up.
I would be really interested to see this group do a study on print media coverage of the pharmaceutical industry. Since print coverage does not have the same stringent 30-second soundbite rules, print coverage could be more balanced. Or not.
“Prescription for Bias” looks at network broadcast coverage during the first three quarters of 2006. The report found that 80% of the stories offer a distorted or slanted view of the industry through completely excluding the viewpoint of the industry. In only 22% of the media stories was the name of the company who invented the new drug therapy even mentioned.
Usually when a group with a strong viewpoint puts out a report like this, it’s pretty easy to punch holes in the logic. However, the methodology is strong and I’m impressed with how this one stands up.
I would be really interested to see this group do a study on print media coverage of the pharmaceutical industry. Since print coverage does not have the same stringent 30-second soundbite rules, print coverage could be more balanced. Or not.