Here is a great article stating what I have tried to say here in various posts. Intelligent Design is rejected as "not science" simply because of the very definition of science, NOT because of any evidence or terrible flaws in the arguments for or against ID. This article is much more articulate about it than I. Enjoy!
Here is a great article stating what I have tried to say here in various posts. Intelligent Design is rejected as "not science" simply because of the very definition of science, NOT because of any evidence or terrible flaws in the arguments for or against ID. This article is much more articulate about it than I. Enjoy!