Fluoridated Water—The Ultimate EvilPosted by Mark Sircus on 27 October 2010 | Filed under Medicine
Sodium fluoride is commonly used as a rat poison. Globalists and eugenicists have decided to add it to water supplies with the message to the public that it is good for teeth, despite warnings from the ADA stating that young children risk a disease called dental fluorosis. Water actually is a battleground between good and evil and we see this in the fluoridation issue. One cannot understand the universe of water without grappling with poisonous fluoride and its government-mandated entry into public water supplies in the United States, Brazil, and several other countries that have stupidly followed America’s lead in water fluoridation. Just because it’s invisible does not make it any less deadly in the long haul in terms of public health. I had to say that because most people in fluoridated countries just don’t mind that it is there; it’s simply off their radar screens. And in fact, when you go back to the history and beginning of water fluoridation, we find out that it was the Nazis who used it first to turn their prisoners of war into passive sheep.
Fluoride is a poison, but that is nothing to worry about since, according to allopathic medicine, everything is poisonous and it is the dose that makes the poison. At the heart of medical science is a cankerous black hole of ugliness that leads right to the door of the American, German, and English governments (just to name the principles), along with the elite families and corporations that have come to control these governments in the last century. These controlling self-interested parties can barely be called human; they have been correctly labeled by all kinds of horrid names and have forever been a part of and hidden by secret societies. And they have all kinds of people who have sold their souls to those who do their bidding and call it science.
Fluoride was used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing-down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas and many other medications.
When it comes to water fluoridation we have to take off our gloves, but that is hard for most of us because we have been heavily fluoridated. And we have been exposed to, in hundreds of millions of cases, overwhelming amounts of another neurological depressant and an even more dangerous neurological poison, and that is mercury in the form of dental amalgam, vaccines containing thimerosal, as well increasing levels of environmental mercury pollution from the burning of coal and cremation of humans with mercury dental fillings still in their mouths. But of course no one has done any studies of the neurological effects of fluoride when combined with mercury exposure, which varies widely from one person to another depending on where they live and their vaccine and dental history.
“One aspect of the issue of Man’s alleged evil nature is rarely, if ever, addressed. This is the wholesale poisoning of Mankind and its affect on the brain and behavior of Mankind. Man’s food, water, and air (smog, chemtrails) are ever more poisoned. Our medicines are toxic and may be causing more harm than good, our dental fillings are called ‘silver’ yet are over half mercury; likewise our infants are forced to have vaccinations also with mercury and other toxins. The proven carcinogen fluoride is added to water and is in many medicines and toothpastes. The German Nazi regime is said to have fluoridated water because it made people docile. Is the same rationale ongoing in the USA? In a ludicrous ‘environmental’ change, incandescent bulbs are soon to be phased out and replaced with more efficient fluorescent bulbs that all have mercury within them?! All the toxins in the food, water, air, medicines, fillings, and vaccines have a terrible effect on people’s brains. Few people can truly think and change, or have the courage to act. These toxins also cause much chronic, degenerative illness, cancer, etc. The mercury in vaccines does cause autism,” writes the anonymous physicist.
Twin Toxic Dangers of Mercury and Fluoride
I have always liked all my dentists, trusting their competence more than doctors, but when I began to understand the twin dangers of fluoride and dental mercury amalgam I began to see that the entire profession has been duped, and that goes for most graduates of medical school. We first-world people like to think that our universities and medical schools are centers of higher learning and intelligence, but the fact is that they are intense conditioning machines that forcefully mind shape the brains of their vulnerable students who start out with good intentions.
Fluoride is a toxic poison that has known serious side effects.
In my book The Terror of Pediatric Medicine I write about the terror of mercury in vaccines and the incredible fact that our beloved pediatricians in white coats are actually the worst kind of terrorists because they concentrate their dark intentions on newborns and little children. I mention this because here in this chapter, before we really get into any serious science about fluoride, we also have to mention the abomination of adding fluoride to toothpaste and again exposing children to its toxic profile.
Scientific evidence over the past 50 plus years has shown that sodium fluoride shortens our life span, promotes various cancers and mental disturbances, and most importantly, makes humans stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one neat little package.
In 1993 I helped start the Medical Veritas medical journal and in one of its first issues was Dr. Paul Connett’s essay, Fifty Reasons To Be Against Fluoridation. Unfortunately, and in part due to fluoridation and our increasing mercury exposure it, is hard for us humans to be effectively against anything so the horror goes on, yet people like Dr. Connett fight on. He has now published:The Case Against Fluoride: how hazardous waste ended up in our drinking water and the bad science and powerful politics that keep it there, by Connett P, Beck J, and Micklem HS, summarizes thehistorical, political, ethical, toxicological, andepidemiological scientific data behind drinking-waterfluoridation. The book concludes that, if proposedtoday, fluoridation of drinking water to prevent toothdecay would stand virtually no chance of beingadopted, given the current status of scientificknowledge.
In the case of water fluoridation, according to the above authors, the chemicals that go into the drinking water that more than 180 million people drink each day in the United States are not even pharmaceutical grade, but rather a hazardous waste product of the phosphate fertilizer industry. It is illegal to dump this waste into the sea or local surface water, and yet it is allowed in our drinking water. To make matters worse, this program receives no oversight from the Food and Drug Administration, and the Environmental Protection Agency takes no responsibility for the practice. And from an ethical standpoint, say the authors, water fluoridation is a bad medical practice; individuals are being forced to take medication without their informed consent; there is no control over the dose and no monitoring of possible side effects.
Acute high oral exposure to fluoride may lead to nausea, vomiting,abdominal pain, diarrhea, drowsiness, headaches, polyuria and polydipsia, coma, convulsions, cardiac arrest, and death.
Historically, fluoride was quite expensive for the world’s premier chemical companies to dispose of, but in the 50s and 60s, Alcoa and the entire aluminum industry—with a vast overabundance of the toxic waste—somehow sold the FDA and our government on the insane (but highly profitable) idea of buying this poison and then injecting it into our water supply as well as into the nation’s toothpastes and dental rinses. Consider also that when sodium fluoride is injected into our drinking water, its level is approximately one part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink one-half of one percent of the total water supply, the hazardous chemical literally “goes down the drain” and voila—the chemical industry not only has a free hazardous waste disposal system, but we have also paid them with our health and our pocketbooks for the process.
The aluminum and phosphate fertilizer industries were not alone. The American government’s atomic weapons program was also producing huge amounts of fluoride and was getting sued by famers for the damage done to their cattle.
In part one of The Case Against Fluoride, “The Ethical and General Arguments Against Fluoridation”:The requirement for the informedconsent of the patient before administration of amedication is a basic human right. Yet with fluoride, which is added to drinkingwater as a therapeutic intervention, no such permission is sought or given. The process is enforced on every member of the population. The authors explore thisfact in the context of medical ethics. Another aspect is the efficacy of fluoridationas a therapy, which, the authors argue, is marginal at best and deleterious at worst.The fluoride used for water fluoridation is not of pharmaceutical grade, but is in fact a chemical waste byproduct. The lack of any rigorous studies as to the efficacy of fluoridation programs, the authors contend, means that the wholeprocess is experimental. There is no control of “dose”—how much fluorideanyone receives from the water.
Christopher Bryson’s widely acclaimed book The Fluoride Deception includes dozens of peer-reviewed studies showing that sodium fluoride is a deadly neurotoxin that attacks the central nervous system and leads to a multitude of serious health problems. This fact has been covered up by a collusion of government and industry who have reaped financial windfalls while illegally mass medicating the public against their will.
Perhaps the most notable study was conducted by Dr. Phyllis Mullenix Ph.D., a highly respected pharmacologist and toxicologist, who, in a 1995 Forsyth Research Institute study, found that rats who had fluoride added to their diet exhibited abnormal behavioral traits.
A 2008 Scientific American reportconcluded that “Scientific attitudes toward fluoridation may be starting to shift” as new evidence emerges of the poison’s link to disorders affecting teeth, bones, the brain, and the thyroid gland, as well as lowering IQ. “Today almost 60 percent of the U.S. population drinks fluoridated water, including residents of 46 of the nation’s 50 largest cities,” reported Scientific American’s Dan Fagin, an award-wining environmental reporter and Director of New York University’s Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program.
The Scientific American study “concluded that fluoride can subtly alter endocrine function, especially in the thyroid.” “In summary, evidence of several types indicates that fluoride affects normal endocrine function or response; the effects of the fluoride-induced changes vary in degree and kind in different individuals. Fluoride is therefore an endocrine disruptor in the broad sense of altering normal endocrine function or response, although probably not in the sense of mimicking a normal hormone. The mechanisms of action remain to be worked out and appear to include both direct and indirect mechanisms, for example, direct stimulation or inhibition of hormone secretion by interference with second messenger function, indirect stimulation or inhibition of hormone secretion by effects on things such as calcium balance, and inhibition of peripheral enzymes that are necessary for activation of the normal hormone” reports the National Research Council of the National Academies in a 2006 report on page 266.
Fluoride is a thyroid poison and because so many are so heavily exposed, the need for iodine supplementation is vastly increased. There are actually four halogens: iodine, bromine, fluorine, and chlorine. All these halogens use the same receptors in the body. Therefore if a person’s diet is deficient in iodine the iodine receptors in the thyroid and stomach, for example, may fill up with bromine, which is common in grains, bleached flour, sodas, nuts, and oils as well as several plant foods. Iodine is depleted by bromine, which is used as a spray on fruits and vegetables, in baked goods, as a fumigant, and in Prozac, Paxil, and many other pharmaceutical drugs. Chlorine, fluorine, and fluoride are chemically related to iodine, and compete with it, blocking iodine receptors in the thyroid gland.
Dr. David Brownstein says that fluoride inhibits the ability of the thyroid gland to concentrate iodine, and research has shown that fluoride is much more toxic to the body when there is iodine deficiency present. When iodine is supplemented, the excretion rate of the toxic halides bromide, fluoride, and perchlorate is greatly enhanced. Brownstein says that after only one dose of iodine, the excretion of fluoride increased by 78% and this is very important for those who are drinking fluoridatedwater or taking medicines with fluoride in them; bromide excretion rates increased by 50%.
Iodine forms compounds with many elements but is less reactive than the other members of the halogens group and has some metallic light reflectance. There is a well-known law of halogen displacement: the critical activity of any one of these four halogens is in inverse proportion to its atomic weight.
The mechanism behind “halogen displacement” was probably best described by J.C. Jarvis, M.D. (Folk Medicine, Henry Holt & Co., 1958, HB, p. 136), who wrote: “The clinical activity of any one of these four halogens is in inverse proportion to its atomic weight. This means that any one of the four can displace the element with a higher atomic weight, but cannot displace an element with a lower atomic weight. For example, flourine can displace chlorine, bromine, and iodine because flourine has a lower atomic weight than the other three. Similarly, chlorine can displace bromine and iodine because they both have a higher atomic weight.” Likewise, bromine can displace iodine from the body because iodine has a higher atomic weight. A reverse order is not possible.
Fluoride and Cancer
In 2005, a study conducted at the Harvard School of Dental Health found that fluoride in tap water directly contributes to causing bone cancer in young boys.“New American research suggests that boys exposed to fluoride between the ages of five and 10 will suffer an increased rate of osteosarcoma—bone cancer—between the ages of 10 and 19,” according to a London Observer article about the study.
Based on the findings of the study, the respected Environmental Working Group lobbied to have fluoride in tap water be added to the U.S. government’s classified list of substances known or anticipated to cause cancer in humans. Cancer rates in the U.S. have skyrocketed with one in three people now contracting the disease at some stage in their life.
The link to bone cancer has also been discovered by other scientists, but a controversy ensued after it emerged that Harvard Professor Chester Douglass, who downplayed the connection in his final report, was in fact editor-in-chief of The Colgate Oral Health Report, a quarterly newsletter funded by Colgate-Palmolive Co., which makes fluoridated toothpaste.
An August 2006 Chinese study found that fluoride in drinking water damages children’s liver and kidney functions.