Everyone makes money on organ transplants except the donor. That’s right physicians, hospitals, clinics, Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) and funeral homes all make money on organ donation. The 258 solid organ transplant centers in the U.S. share the wealth of this multi-billion dollar industry but the organ donor gets nothing more than the satisfaction of having done a good thing.
There are 117,000 people waiting for transplants in the United States. Only about 28,000 of the procedures are done here yearly and that fact has remained static for several years while the number of people on the list keeps increasing. Last year there were about 6,000 living donations and over 7,000 patients died while waiting for their names to come up on the transplant list. Those are very disturbing numbers.
What is more disturbing, even infuriating is the fact that while survey’s show overwhelming American support for organ donation (over 90% of us think it’s a great idea) only about 40% of us ever get around to becoming donors. That’s why people are dying. It’s not that Americans don’t want to donate…it’s just that they don’t get around to it…there is no sense of urgency for them as there is for the patient who quietly waits for his or her call to come.
With only 40% donating organs it is obvious we should be trying something else, Perhaps it is time to find a new way to encourage people to become donors now rather than continuing to kick the can down the road and allowing more people to die . Guilt trips haven’t worked well and neither have appeals to the human sense of sacrifice and doing the right thing so that means we absolutely must try something else and that something is money. Money talks, money works and money motivates.
Before I get into any suggestions on how to use money or where to get it let’s go back to my opening comments. Everyone is making money on organ transplants except the patient. Let’s look at just how much money is involved.
According to Transplant Living http://www.transplantliving.org/before-the-transplant/financing-a-transplant/the-costs/ These are the estimated U.S. Average 2011 Billed Charges Per Transplant
*Most transplant programs have social workers and financial coordinators who can help you with the financial details of your transplant. Depending on the structure at your center, one or both will help you develop a strategy. For a finely detailed analysis of the cost of transplants you’ll want to study this report from 2008 http://publications.milliman.com/research/health-rr/pdfs/2008-us-organ-tisse-RR4-1-08.pdf
Medical costs include:
Non-medical costs include:
The above data clearly establish that transplants are expensive and that a good many people and organizations are profiting from it and I have no objection to that. People ought to be paid for their work. At the same time, though, is it fair that donor’s and their families get nothing? Is it fair that in many cases donors, especially living donors may have substantial out of pocket expenses that are not reimbursed?
Living donors actually face a disincentive because they may have to pay the bills for travel, meals, accommodations, lost income and other expenses, including medical costs if their own health is compromised because of the operations. They also take on at least some risk of future discrimination from employers or insurers.
The American Medical Association says that at the low end, the added expense of donating may be a few hundred dollars, but the range can rise to about $20,000. The AMA points out that while Federal law strictly prohibits the selling of any organs, donors may be reimbursed legally for their expenses. Still, that hardly is a guarantee.
Not well known is the fact that low-income donors and recipients can get financial aid through the National Living Donor Assistance Center, which is federally funded. More affluent recipients also can choose to pay donors’ expenses directly. But most donors come from that great middle ground where they may have to experience a financial loss in order to donate an organ. That is an extraordinary and unreasonable expectations and should be addressed. Why should a donor have to pay a financial price for doing the right thing?
According to the American Medical Association (AMA) the ir House of Delegates voiced its support in June of 2012 for an important proposition: http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2012/08/13/edsa0813.htm
“Living donors should not have to fear negative financial consequences for giving the gift of life. The recommendations call on governments, state and federal, to help remove financial barriers to living donation. That includes provisions for mitigating out-of-pocket expenses, ensuring access to health insurance, and guaranteeing freedom from discrimination in employment and in obtaining life insurance.
One example noted in a report to delegates is the proposed federal “Share Your Spare Act,” which would provide a tax credit of up to $10,000 to cover donor expenses or lost wages. A number of states and the federal government already have enacted a patchwork of donor work leave provisions, mostly for government employees. There also are a number of state tax credit provisions for donors.
The Affordable Care Act and its prohibition against preexisting condition denials, upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court after the delegates’ vote, is expected largely to take care of concerns about donors’ future access to health insurance coverage starting in 2014. Necessary legal protections against discrimination in employment and in purchasing life insurance are still lacking.”
Deceased donors pay nothing for the organ recovery and transplant process but their families still have to foot the bill for the illness that caused them to die and for all expenses following the death including funerals. Somehow it seems as though there should be some accommodation for donors. More for Living donors who can actually experience considerable cost to both their financial and physical health but why not at least pay funeral expenses for the gift of life from deceased donors?
When the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) passed and was signed into law in 1984 it prohibited payments for organs but did not prohibit reimbursement of expenses. It didn’t address that subject at all. That would be a perfectly legal step to take and maybe, given the right explanation, the public would approve of a financial incentive to donate that would at least cover expenses including funerals. Other incentives could be contributions to retirement plans, college scholarships or paying some or all of the cost of health care for the surviving spouse or partner.
We should point out here that the organ in greatest demand is, of course, the kidney. In the U.S. of the 117,000 people on the transplant list, about 90,000 of them are waiting for kidneys. How do we get more kidneys? One way is to pay for them which is strictly prohibited by the 1984 law that established the organ transplant industry. Laws, though, can be changed and if the proper safeguards are in place paying for organs could work. An example of a country where organs are legally bought and sold is Iran. Yes, Iran. Not often an example of anything good this system seems to be working for Iran as they have virtually eliminated their kidney shortage.
Iran is the only country where the selling and buying of kidneys is legal. As a result, there is no shortage of the organs. Here’s how it works there. The system allows people to sell and buy kidneys under state-regulated surveillance. Two charities facilitate the process by finding potential vendors and introducing them to the recipients, and are charged with checking the compatibility of a possible donation and ensuring a fair trade. After the transplant, the vendor is compensated by both the government and the recipient. Iranians are not allowed to donate kidneys to non-citizens.
Would that work here…there are pros and cons but there’s also a little bit of research on the subject. In 2010 a survey of 409 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania commuters was published by the American Medical Association on how willing people would be to donate under 12 different scenarios. The study found that many concerns about paying kidney donors may be overblown. Among other things, participants were asked how willing they would be to donate a kidney to family members or strangers for no pay, for $10,000, or $100,000.
“The study provides no evidence whatsoever that the poor would be exploited or wouldn’t make informed choices,” said Scott D. Halpern, MD, PhD, the study’s lead author and assistant professor of medicine and epidemiology in the division of pulmonary and critical care medicine at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. “The central finding is that payments do not seem to influence the poor more than the rich. The influence of a $10,000 payment on people earning more than $100,000 a year is the same as a $10,000 payment is for people earning less than $20,000 a year.”
On the flip side of the “pay for organs” issue there are some very serious concerns. Pakistan, for example, is rife with kidney for sale nightmares. According to a 2007 story in the Washington Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/13/AR2007041302066.html “About 40 percent of the people in some Pakistani villages are turning up with only one kidney . Charts presented at the meetings show that the number of “donations” from unrelated Pakistanis is skyrocketing. Two-thirds of the people receiving these organs are foreigners. Data from the Philippines show the same thing.” And it is even worse today in 2013.
A number of arguments against selling organs get bandied about, but there are two which lie behind most of the others. The first involves the concern with how selling organs leads to the commodification of human bodies, and the second is the concern with the exploitation of the poor for the benefit of the rich. These are difficult arguments to explain and are not convincing to everyone, but they cut to the heart of what we want our society ultimately to be like.
The bottom line is that something must be done to meet the demand for organs. It is at least as unethical to let people die because of being afraid to change the system as it is to pay for organs from poor people. You can learn more on this subject by checking out these links:
Bob Aronson of Bob’s Newheart is a 2007 heart transplant recipient, the founder of Facebook’s nearly 2,500 member Organ Transplant Initiative and the author of most of these donation/transplantation blogs.
You may comment in the space provided or email your thoughts to me at firstname.lastname@example.org. And – please spread the word about the immediate need for more organ donors. There is nothing you can do that is of greater importance. If you convince one person to be an organ and tissue donor you may save or positively affect over 60 lives. Some of those lives may be people you know and love.
Please view our video “Thank You From the Bottom of my Donor’s heart” on http://www.organti.org This video was produced to promote organ donation so it is free and no permission is needed for its use.
If you want to spread the word personally about organ donation, we have another PowerPoint slide show for your use free and without permission. Just go to http://www.organti.org and click on “Life Pass It On” on the left side of the screen and then just follow the directions. This is NOT a stand-alone show; it needs a presenter but is professionally produced and factually sound. If you decide to use the show I will send you a free copy of my e-book, “How to Get a Standing “O” that will help you with presentation skills. Just write to email@example.com and usually you will get a copy the same day.
Also…there is more information on this blog site about other donation/transplantation issues. Additionally we would love to have you join our Facebook group, Organ Transplant Initiative The more members we get the greater our clout with decision makers.