Stats Don't Lie: States That Went for McCain In the Prez. Election Are Stupid
Posted Sep 15 2009 10:06pm
[Originally posted December 8, 2008.]
This post will be a series of factual statements from which the reader can draw his/her own conclusions, because giving my own -- as I did in the headline -- would be inflammatory.
Morgan Quinto Press publishes, yearly, Smartest State Awards. The most recent, free, results are here, and for 2006 to 2007. My statistics come from this page.
Quinto uses 21 factors processed through a formula ( details of which can be found here ) to assign a numerical value to each state. That value shows how "smart" the state is compared to the national average.
For example: Vermont was the smartest state in '06-'07, with a "Smart Rating" of 18.57. Arizona was the least "smart" state, and rated -17.61.
I printed a map of the US that showed which states' electoral votes were awarded to Obama in the 2008 election, and which states went to McCain. I used the map and Quinto's Smart Rating numbers to make the following calculations:
*The 27 states that went to Obama had a total Smart Rating of 43.45.
*The 23 states that voted for McCain had a total Smart Rating of -65.27.
*States that went to Obama had an average Smart Rating of 1.609.
*States that went to McCain had an average Smart Rating of -2.838.
I also think it's important to note that eight of the ten "smartest" states voted for Obama.