Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page:
Go
Search posts:

I don't disagree with the data; it disagrees with me.

Posted May 16 2010 4:03am
This explains so much.
The Scientific Impotence Excuse:Discounting Belief-Threatening Scientific Abstracts

The scientific impotence discounting hypothesis predicts that people resist belief-disconfirming scientific evidence by concluding that the topic of study is not amenable to scientific investigation. In 2 studies, participants read a series of brief abstracts that either confirmed or disconfirmed their existing beliefs about a stereotype associated with homosexuality. Relative to those reading belief-confirming evidence, participants reading belief-disconfirming evidence indicated more belief that the topic could not be studied scientifically and more belief that a series of other unrelated topics could not be studied scientifically. Thus, being presented with belief-disconfirming scientific evidence may lead to an erosion of belief in the efficacy of scientific methods.
But, is "disconfirming' really a word? (Prove it!)
Post a comment
Write a comment:

Related Searches