
I don't think there has been much research that has shown "negative" effects from acupuncture. There have been many that have shown no effect either way with acupuncture. That doesn't make it a bad option, though.
In regards to the German study specifically. There are some very important things to know about the study population:
1. Average length of back pain was ~8 years!
2. Had already failed "standard" or "traditional" treatments.
3. NO DIFFERENCE in gains between the SHAM and "REAL" acupuncture groups.
This is not surprising as when a sham group is used, many studies have found that the sham and "real" acupuncture do just as well. And, as this recent study demonstrated, sometimes the sham does better.
So whether the simple act of sticking needles in someone - irregardless where - or a strong placebo effect, those with chronic LBP greater than 8 years that have failed "traditional" treatment - Physical Therapy, Medication, Chiropractic, etc - a trial of acupuncture could potentially be a helpful modality.
Write a comment:
|
Acupuncture, Traditional or Not, Helps Lower Back Pain
Posted by Nirmala N.
According to a recent German study, acupuncture is more effective than conventional treatments to eradicate lower back pain...however, it's no more effective than a "sham needle" treatment. The study looked at over a thousand patients treated with traditional Chinese acupuncture, sham acupuncture, and conventional approaches like drugs and physical therapy. According to researchers, acupuncture helped easae the inensity of pain and also gave patients a reprieve from chronic disabilities associated with their back pain. With the traditional acupuncture, needles were inserted in fixed points and depths on the body. With the sham treatment, needles were inserted in the lower back but not at acupuncture points or the proper depth. All the same, patients who got both traditional and sham acupuncture were twice as likely to improve over six months than those who didn't.