Why the #prochoice movement is flawed&ignores human rights&science #prolife #tcot #parents
Posted Jun 28 2011 6:54pm
This post is in response to a pro-abortion advocate who insists human fetus are homo sapiens but not yet human beings until they are born.[which I find common misinformed logic among those who support abortion,they attempt to dehumanize the preborn in order to justify the indefensible.] I attempt to counter her claim with facts from medical and legal definitions to embryology and explain how protection of human rights is seen internationally as inherent from conception. However, sadly for reasons unknown, these treaties and crimes against humanity have been ignored or unenforced, particularly in the United States.
@woolybumblebee of the blog Is God a Squirrel? writes:
The Pro-Life Debate, and Why it is Flawed : "I have encountered many pro-life people in my lifetime, and many of them tend to argue the same point over and over. Their main argument against abortion is that a fetus is a "human being", and therefor should be granted the right to be born, and not aborted. The right to life."
@woolybumblebee further claims in her post these definitions for human,human being and species
Being a "human being" is distinguished from other animals characterized by superior mental development, power of articulate speech, and upright stance.
Human: The label given to the species of said mammal.
Human Being: Distinguished from other animals characterized by superior mental development, power of articulate speech, and upright stance.Of the species Homo Sapiens
Species: Having or showing characteristics regarded as distinguishing humans from other animals. It is the most basic unit or category of biological classification, which is the systematic arrangement of similar entities on the basis of certain differing characteristics and the basis of their relationships.
She bases this analysis based on these definitions
Now lets look at terminology comparing the meanings of "Human", "Human Being", "Species", and "Fetus".
human [ˈhjuːmən] 1. A member of the genus Homo and especially of the species H. sapiens. 2. of, characterizing, or relating to man and mankind (Human Nature) 3. having the attributes of man as opposed to animals, divine beings, or machines; a. kind or considerate b. natural
human being; homo, man, human (any man, woman, or child, living or extinct member of the family Hominidae distinguished from other animals characterized by superior mental development, power of articulate speech, and upright stance. Of the species Homo sapiens,
fetus (fe-tus) 1. The unborn young of a viviparous vertebrate having a basic structural resemblance to the adult animal. 2. In humans, the unborn young from the end of the eighth week after conception to the moment of birth, as distinguished from the earlier embryo. 3. The unborn offspring of a mammal at the later stages of its development, especially a human from eight weeks after fertilization to its birth. In a fetus, all major body organs are present.
My response to the above blog post tweeted to me last night from @woolybumblebee follows
I respectfully must disagree. If a fetus is a human species of human parents,then they are a human being& the level of their development should not deny them of human rights and the right to life. That is discrimination.
You said:consciousness and ability to respond to one's environment is the key to being a human being.
I disagree with this point because people in coma have no conscience but are still human beings.We were all fetus,embryo,blastocyst at one time, if we were not given the right to live none of us would be here. Thankfully, not all of us believe that we don't have a right to life until born. The mere fact that we are human species and human beings in the womb proves we are the same persons we become outside the womb that we were inside,just more developed;this is why feticide laws protect the preborn, because if someone assaults/kills a pregnant woman& or the fetus dies it is double homicide or feticide. The taking of the fetus life;takes away his/her right to life.
Just because mammals may resemble one another at early stages of development still does not give us reason to kill other humans because of the way they look[or their level of development]. That is how we all looked and the level of function we all were at that stage of our life. If someone terminates the fetus they are not given the chance to live& develop into the full infant,child,teen,adult they would become, as any living woman was given. Without the right to life& the continuation of our species we will die out. Nations such as China& India have chosen gendercide,because of this they have a low female population. Worldwide there have been 163M females aborted;without women there will be no more civilization.
Sadly, prenatal testing has led to the slaughter of millions of children based on sex,disability or some other anomaly. A humane society should be protecting the defenseless not killing them for convenience or because they are less developed humans.
To further elaborate on my comments, I want to add the following
The other thing she ignores is the fact that based on the definition of a fetus:
In humans, the unborn young from the end of the eighth week after conception to the moment of birth, as distinguished from the earlier embryo.
This clearly tells us thefetus is a human being and the unborn young of human beings, because they are human.Therefore, the level of developmental ability is not required to be a human being. The level of function at that stage of development is consistent with all human beings at that stage of life.
In addition, according to the English definition of human being:
The term human and human being are interchangeable. Now on to the legal term for person, which many proabort advocates claim the human fetus are not yet persons/people until they are born
PERSON. This word is applied to men, women and children, who are called natural persons. In law, man and person are not exactly synonymous terms. Any human being is a man, whether he be a member of society or not, whatever may be the rank he holds, or whatever may be his age, sex...Natural persons are divided into males, or men; and females or women.
A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.
Therefore, because the species& gender of a fetus can be determined through DNA and ultrasound, they are either female or male, thus legally natural persons and they are legally human beings regardless of age or gender.
Additionally, because a human fetus is a homo sapien and the offspring of human beings, they are legally persons
Article 1(2)says:For the purpose of this Convention, 'person' means every human being&
Article 4(1)of The American Convention on Human Rights says:Every person has the right to have his life respected. This right shall be protected by law& in general,from the moment of conception.
Therefore,under this legally signed treaty by a former President, and based on science,legal& medical definitions above, human fetus have human rights and are protected as persons. Sadly, for unknown reasons,Congress has not yet signed on to this International Treaty,but it is said to be legally binding since it is a signed treaty. The abortion lobbyists are most likely behind the treaty not getting signed, since in 1973 the Supreme Court ruled on Roe V Wade&the US has ignored this 1977 treaty, along with the medical and scientific definitions of what constitutes a human being/person.