Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page:
Go
Search posts:

#abortion You can see a miniature person...as a physician I'm trained 2 conserve life&here I am destroying #life

Posted Jan 24 2011 9:14pm

When you do a D & C most of the tissue is removed by the Olden forceps or ring clamp and you actually get gross parts of the fetus out. So you can see a miniature person so to speak, and even now I occasionally feel a little peculiar about it because as a physician I'm trained to conserve life and here I am destroying life." - Dr. Benjamin Kalish, Abortionist10-14 weeks


First of all those who say Marco Rubio or any other elected official has no right to support the pro-life cause are sadly ignorant of the 1st Amendment and free speech, and ignore the fact that Obama came out in support of Roe V Wade , saying he doesn't think the government should interfere in private family matters. If that were the case we wouldn't have foster homes, child abuse laws,etc. and we sure wouldn't have any form of social entitlement programs, such as health care reform being forced on people. Roe v Wade: Seven men robed in black declared that pre-born children are not persons. This law oversteps the Constitutional rights of the states and should never have become a federal law, but a state by state law.  Like health care reform law, this law also needs to be repealed and nullified by the states.



Secondly, those who say that the right to have an abortion is a constitutional right are mistaken and the only reason this failed law passed was because at least one of the judges felt abortion was a doctor's right, not a woman's right, to provide the 'medical procedure' under the condition the mother's life was endangered ,not to kill because of economics or convenience. However, it is not a constitutional right because there is nowhere in the Constitution that says we have a right to kill our unborn children for any reason;nor are their reproductive rights granted, those are given by our Creator,as some are unable to conceive.



Lastly, if you are going to have sex use protection or abstain or take responsibility for your actions and be prepared to raise a child or put the child up for adoption. Just like those libs that like to say, 'you don't want an abortion don't have one'...but liberals are too selfish to think responsibly. If you don't want to risk pregnancy than don't have sex. Yet liberals want all the social welfare programs to support entitlements, but want to rid themselves of 'unwanted children' who you say might grow up to be abused or become criminals because of poverty,etc.



Your justification fails your own logic, especially when you advocate for social welfare entitlements, why not give that right to the unborn? In addition, those who say a baby isn't human until after it is born, that is not biologically proven. Biologically life starts at conception, a living cell is alive! But because you consider the sperm&the egg and the fetus a blob of cells you justify the slaughter of innocent babies who are not given the same chance at life,liberty and the pursuit of happiness you were given when you were born. Yet you whine about saving animals,eagle eggs,protest the wars and anything else you call an injustice to human rights and civil rights. Such hypocrisy!!



Liberals who claim to be so concerned about these rights care nothing about the unborn and see it more convenient to dispose of the unborn than to take a more responsible approach to save the life of the child and provide for them. How convenient for the men who advocate for 'women's rights' that they do not have to take responsibility and pay child support or wed the women they impregnate.







Abortion is a violent act , not a medical procedure, and it is rarely needed for medical reasons or rape victims . Finally, I believe that abortion is an outdated procedure that is less necessary because of medical advances, social acceptance of single mothers, unwed teens, etc and the increased number of crisis pregnancy clinics available today, in addition to the number of parents seeking to adopt who are unable to have their own child. If we can't respect the right to life for those in the womb how can we create a culture that respects life?



Thomas Jefferson wrote, “The God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time.”



Whether you believe in God or not, what right do you have to take the life and liberty of an innocent baby in the security of the womb? What about their human and civil rights? If you are a moral person you must believe ending the life of another human is murder, therefore ending the life of an unborn person is murder. If you are a Christian you are lying to yourself when you are advocating for the right to choice and reproductive rights because the choice is taking responsibility for the risks involved in having a child and your reproductive rights are given to you, who are you to take someone's away? Do you want to become a culture like China or some Muslim countries who end the life of 'unwanted children' because of convenience or gender or any other reason?



Related


Abortion "safe" clinics dispose babies in haz-mat trash or chop them up into tiny pieces before sucked out of womb


 


View the discussion thread.    

Post a comment
Write a comment:

Related Searches