Health knowledge made personal
Join this community!
› Share page: Email Digg del.icio.us Reddit icon StumbleUpon Technorati
Go
Search posts:

Mark Pool, MD's Twitter Updates

Low-cost, mini microscope geared toward global health http://t.co/gL4ZxfI via @addthis 266 days ago
CDC warns of rising spread of babesiosis through blood transfusions http://t.co/lTwKaKL 266 days ago
Very disappointing study, scary how decisions based on so few #s: Cancer trial participation less than 1% http://t.co/RhY7Mkg via @addthis 277 days ago
You may have already seen blog @ Digital Pathology Blog but check out the Pathology Visions Conference-should be great! http://t.co/TVW0M7P 279 days ago
WCLC 2011 Oral Presentations: (More) Genomics http://t.co/xIOaw9j 280 days ago
 

PETACC-3 study and correlation of molecular markers with stage-specific prognosis

Posted May 06 2009 12:00am

The Pan-European Trials in Alimentary Tract Cancers (PETACC-3) is a large phase III randomized trial that yielded pathologic samples evaluable for IHC and molecular testing from 1404 patients with stage II/III cancer in a substudy to correlate various markers with stage-specific prognosis.  The markers evaluated included p53, SMAD4, thymidylate synthase, telomerase, MSI, 18q LOH, KRAS mutation, and BRAF mutation.

The study compared 420 stage II patients and 984 stage III patients.  The most interesting finding from this substudy is strikingly different changes in marker expression between the two groups.  This suggests that stage II and stage III CRC develop through distinctly different molecular pathways and, thus, may represent different biological and clinico-pathologic entities, instead of the conventional idea that stage III cancers progress sequentially from stage II cancers.

MSI, p53 overexpression, and loss of SMAD4 expression are predictive of outcome but the predictive value is different between stage II and stage III.  MSI had prognostic significance in stage II but not stage III, while p53 overexpression and SMAD4 loss had prognostic significance in stage III but not stage II.  Studies such as these have implications for not only for identifying stage II patients who could be candidates for chemotherapy but for screening.

There is a whole other story about SMAD4, juvenile polyposis, bone morphogenetic protein signaling, and CRC--but that will have to wait for another post.

Post a comment
Write a comment:

Related Searches