A new report from an independent panel of experts, coordinated by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), has recommended significant changes in the standard daily intake and the upper limits of daily intake of vitamin D. However, some authorities are already arguing that the independent panel didn’t go far enough.
The facts as provided by the Institute of Medicine are available from four documents:
The precise role of vitamin D in overall management of a variety of aspects of health is still not well established, and its value in the management of prostate cancer in particular is even less well grounded in established science.
We have no interest in attempting to review the pros and cons of all the different points of view. We feel that people should be aware of the new guidelines issued by the IOM and of the fact that there are many specialists who believe high physiological levels of vitamin D can improve health under certain specific circumstances. We will, however, repeat our general belief that good health comes from “good genes,” a variety of healthy behaviors, and a good and varied diet. Over-dependence on one particular nutrient or supplement (such as vitamin D) is probably not the ideal way to manage one’s health.