Yesterday, in a segment on autism and vaccines on the Today Show, Dr. David Tayloe, President Elect of the American Academy of Pediatrics, was asked the following question:
"Do you believe that all vaccines should be used on every child?"
His complete response:
"Yes. I think any of the vaccines we have today have been tested and proven to be safe, and the credible studies don't show any relationship between vaccines and permanent injury . So we favor this and we know that unless we have vaccination rates that are in the 90 to 95% range we are not going to prevent epidemics from coming into this country of measles, of polio, from countries where these diseases are still endemic. So its very important that we vaccinate all our children."
Repeating: No "relationship between vaccines and permanent injury".
This is probably the most glaring falsehood that I have heard in the vaccine debate yet, stated by the chief pediatrician in the US, to whom all other pediatricians look to for guidance in how to treat their patients.
Has Dr. Tayloe has never heard of the Federal Program called the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the sole purpose of which it to compensate people for the permanent injuries that they sustain from approved vaccines?
From the VICP section of the HRSA web site that shows the vaccine injuries that are covered :
"The Vaccine Injury Table (Table) makes it easier for some people to get compensation. The Table lists and explains injuries/conditions that are presumed to be caused by vaccines . It also lists time periods in which the first symptom of these injuries/conditions must occur after receiving the vaccine. If the first symptom of these injuries/conditions occurs within the listed time periods, it is presumed that the vaccine was the cause of the injury or condition unless another cause is found. For example, if you received the tetanus vaccines and had a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis) within 4 hours after receiving the vaccine, then it is presumed that the tetanus vaccine caused the injury if no other cause is found ."
A quick rundown of a few of the covered reactions:
DTaP, Tdap, DTP-Hib, MMR, MR, R - Anaphylactic shock, encephalopathy, any accute complication or sequela of above events(including death).
Rubella vaccines - Chronic arthritis, any acute complication or sequela (including death) of above event.
Measles vaccines - Thrombocytopenic purpura , Mealses, any acute complication or sequela (including death) of above event.
Live Virus Polio vaccines - Polio.
Inactivated Virus Polio vaccines - Anaphylactic shock, any acute complication or sequela of above events(including death).
I am pretty sure that "Death" could be considered permanent injury.
Additionally, perhaps Dr. Tayloe has never read a package insert in a box of vaccine .
Here is a random sample of insert quotes. Let's start with the one that sent my two week old Chandler into three months worth of fevers and crying and two years of consipation:
ENGERIX-B, Hepatitis B Vaccine -
"Multiple Sclerosis: Although no causal relationship has been established, rare instances of exacerbation of multiple sclerosis have been reported following administration of hepatitis B vaccines and other vaccines. In persons with multiple sclerosis, the benefit of immunization for prevention of hepatitis B infection and sequelae must be weighed against the risk of exacerbation of the disease."
"Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility: ENGERIX-B has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility."
"Postmarketing Reports: Additional adverse experiences have been reported with the commercial use of ENGERIX-B. Those listed below are to serve as alerting information to physicians.
"CONTRAINDICATIONS - Hypersensitivity to any component of the vaccine, including yeast, is a contraindication. This vaccine is contraindicated in patients with previous hypersensitivity to any hepatitis B-containing vaccine."
(Even though my baby, in no uncertain terms, showed "hypersensitivity", his doctors continued to administer the vaccine to him until his regression at 18 months).
This is given to babies that are hours old. And remember, the head of the AAP says, even though the package insert says different, that the vaccine is safe for every child and no permanent injury will occur.
Fluvirin, Flu Vaccine
But if Dr. Tayloe is right, the package insert should be changed to read:
"No studies regarding the simultaneous administration of inactivated influenza vaccine and other childhood vaccines have been conducted."
One more... Merck's MMR vaccine :
Now that Dr. Tayloe is running the AAP, with they remove that statement from the insert?
I have not even gotten to the sections on Adverse Reactions yet, but I have already made my point.
Oh, yeah... and then last week the Hannah Poling case broke.
It is factual to say that in come cases, approved vaccines DO result in permanent injury and that not all vaccines are safe for all children.
Dr. Tayloe is wrong.
Either he knows what I have written above, in which case he has lied to the American public and has not place as the head of the AAP, or he does not know what I have written above, in which case he is incompetent to be the head of the AAP.
... and there is not a chance in hell that he does not know about all that I have written here.
Additionally, allow me to draw your attention to the second half of Dr. Tayloe's statement:
"So we favor this and we know that unless we have vaccination rates that are in the 90 to 95% range we are not going to prevent epidemics from coming into this country of measles, of polio, from countries where these diseases are still endemic. So its very important that we vaccinate all our children."
Note the goal of his vaccination policy, not to serve the best interest of your individual child, but to protect this country of a viral epidemic.
Keep in mind, that when your are in the pediatricians office and he is looking at your child and making decisions on how to treat him, the AAP, his professional organization has taught him that your baby is not his client. That 'society' is his client. And that depending on how ethical he is or how sharp his critical thinking skills are, he may not actually be serving your child, but "the greater good".
We have been lobbying the AAP to reevaluate vaccines and move in a more cautious direction in making recommendations for their doctors.
If the appointment of Dr. Tayloe and his criminal pronouncements are the response to the AAP of parents increasingly loud protestations of their destructive direction, then it is time to start ignoring the AAP.
There are many, many pediatrician out there who genuinely want to work in the best interests of their patients, and as difficult as it was for me and Honey to hear Dr. Tayloe lie on tv, it must have been more difficult for them to have heard. They know that serious vaccine reactions exist, and they just watched the man that represents them tell a very stupid lie to the entire country.
(plesee excuse any typos, etc, as I have not had a chance to proof this. I reserve the right to make corrections)