I’m a bit short of time this morning so couldn’t give this story the time it deserved. The following is a cut and paste job from Fox Houston :
Dreams brought Kenneth Chibuogwu to America and in time determination brought many of those aspirations within reach.
“I worked hard. I came to this country with nothing,” says Kenneth.
It is a country this father and husband have deeply embraced, along with its core convictions.
“If you don’t stand up for something, you’ll fall for anything,” he says.
And what could be more worthy of battle than his first born son, Chapuka, “Chuka” for short a child who will spend each and every day of his life challenged with autism?
“This child was a gift from God,” insists Kenneth.
Guaranteed by federal law a “free and appropriate education” for their son, Kenneth and wife Neka hoped the Alief School District would prove an able partner in helping Chukka reach his potential.
It didn’t happen.
“When I went there I saw things no mother would want to see,” says Neka her visits to Chuka’s middle school.
“My wife went to observe, found him squashed in the corner and nobody cared,” says Kenneth.
“There was nothing I could do but cry because I was so shocked that such a thing could go on in this country,” added Neka of the repeated conferences with Alief administrators ending in stalemate.
In Texas when parents and educators can’t agree on whether a school district is giving a disabled student all that the law demands the state offers a procedure called “due process” where a sort of education judge listens to all the evidence and decides the issue.
In May of 2007, using much of their life savings, Chuka’s parents filed their case.
Instead of seeking compromise, Alief launched a full-blown legal counterattack alleging the case was “improper” and that the Chibuogwus “harassed” district employees during meetings.
“Nobody in this household harassed the school district. I feel that they harassed us,” insists Neka.
“These people had been railroaded, these people had been maligned,” says special education advocate Jimmy Kilpatrick who represented Chuka and his parents.
Drained and discouraged, Kenneth and Eka dropped their due process case and Chuka never returned to class.
The conflict could have ended there, but Alief Superintendent Louis Stoerner and then board president Sarah Winkler had other plans.
The District sued the economically distressed parents of a special needs child for every penny of the district’s legal expenses, an amount, at the time approaching $170,000 dollars and now estimated at close to a quarter million.
“What I feel is that they are trying to bully me for asking for a chance for my son¿s life,” says Kenneth.
Alief taxpayer and watch dog Bob Hermann sees the lawsuit as senseless and mean spirited.
“I don’t know why we would spend taxpayers money to try and punish somebody who doesn’t have the money and are probably going to win at the end of the day anyway,” says Hermann.
Those who represent special needs families suspect a larger more sinister scheme.
“What they are trying to do is send a chill down parent’s spine about advocating for their children,” says Louis Geigerman, president of the Texas Organization of Parents, Attorneys and Advocates.
“Lets set some examples, lets hang a few of them at high noon right out here in the middle of the town square and show you what we do to people who want to advocate for their children,” adds Kilpatrick.
“If I don’t fight them, you know they are going to do it to other parents,” says Kenneth Chibuogwu.
This past April after three long and expensive years of legal warfare a federal judge here in Houston issued his ruling. Alief I.S.D. was wrong and had no right under the law to collect legal expenses from Chuka’s parents.
Instead of accepting the ruling, superintendent Stoerner and apparently the Alief School board have chosen to risk even more taxpayer dollars and appeal the ruling to the 5th Circuit.
At a board meeting, by phone and by e-mail Fox 26 news has repeatedly asked the Alief decision makers “Why” and have yet to receive an answer.
A district spokeswoman promised comment after the appeals court rules.
“We’ve almost lost everything trying to keep this up,” says Neka.
“What basically there are trying to do is run me and my family on to the street,” says Kenneth
While school expenses are generally available for public inspection Alief has attempted to block our opens records request.
FOX 26 News has however obtained invoices which show the district’s taxpayers have compensated Erik Nikols and his Law firm Rogers, Morris and Grover as much as $12,000 in a single month for waging the three-and-a-half year courthouse campaign against the Chibuougwu’s.
The meter, presumably, is still running.
“I know a lot of people have gained from this, a lot of people have been enriched by this,” says Neka.
As for Chuka, he’s now fourteen, attends no school and for five years hasn’t received a single minute of the free and appropriate public education that is his right
Their child, his parents insist, has been thoroughly left behind.
Tweets that mention Autism Blog - Free and Appropriate Education? « Left Brain/Right Brain -- Topsy.com:
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kev and Bert & Heidi Clover, Alltop Autism. Alltop Autism said: Free and Appropriate Education? http://bit.ly/bWdL1J [...]
School is only recently back in session, but I'm already noticing an uptick in school-related hostility towards the special needs population. The other day a former teacher told me that, "Special needs kids are annoying because they want everything." He went on to say that school services should not cater to autistic kids because "All kids are 'special needs.'" This is not an uncommon attitude. People believe the hysteria about our "failing schools," and they're looking for someone to blame. Autistic kids are an easy target, because we all hear in the the media about how much assistance many of these kids need to succeed. Parents of NT kids, as well as some teachers and school principals, think special needs kids are sapping resources and holding back the rest of the school. I think this is how they justify treating kids and parents as described in this story. The parents "harassed" the school because their child wasn't getting needed services, but the school apparently didn't think the child deserved services. You'd be amazed by how many people would take the school's side in this case.