Andrew Wakefield’s many statements that MMR causes autism
Posted May 08 2012 2:00am
One of the themes that has grown in the past couple of years that Andrew Wakefield never said MMR causes autism. Rather, the story goes, he was a cautious researcher who merely reported what parents told him and called for more research to be done.
Here is an example by Mr. Dan Olmsted of the Age of Autism blog:
That Early Report – which appeared in 1998 in the Lancet, Britain’s other leading medical journal – noted that in eight of the 12 children (including Thomas’s), parents linked the onset of symptoms to the MMR shot, and it called for more research to see if a link in fact existed. It said no link to the MMR was established by the simple case series report.
Despite that cautious approach, the report and its aftermath sparked a firestorm that, fueled by Deer, ultimately led to Wakefield losing his medical license and to the Lancet retracting the report. Yet thousands of parents continue to support Wakefield and describe the same sequence of shot and symptoms as parents in the original case series. Mainstream media, medical groups, public health officials and pharmaceutical companies say any link has been discredited.
For those who have actually followed the Wakefield/MMR story, the idea that Mr. Wakefield’s approach could be described as “cautious” is difficult to swallow. The idea that the “firestorm” was fueled by Mr. Deer is an odd assertion at the best. Mr. Wakefield’s now-retracted Lancet paper was published coincident with an anything-but-cautious press conference in February 1998. Mr. Deer started reporting in the story in February of 2004. But this is off topic. Mr. Wakefield is repeatedly cited as merely calling “for more research to see if a link existed”.
Mr. Olmsted is not the only one to use the “only called for more research” theme. Dr. Bob Sears, for example, stated :
1. Dr. Wakefield’s study never claimed there was a link between the MMR and autism – it only suggested a possible correlation between the MMR vaccine triggering intestinal inflammation which seems to occur in some children with autism. He basically called for MORE research to be done on this.
To be fair, the “only called for more research” theme goes back quite a way. Here is a news story from 2003.
The problem for Mr. Wakefield’s supporters is that Mr. Wakefield did not limit his discussion to the Lancet. As already noted, he held a press conference to announce his results and has made many more statements over the years. More to the point, Mr. Wakefield did say that the MMR causes autism.
Here is a collection of Mr. Wakefield’s statements which range from suggesting a possibility that the MMR causes autism to outright claiming that he “has shown” that the use of the MMR vaccine causes autism.
“It has now also been shown that use of the MMR vaccine (which is taken to include live attentuated measles vaccine virus, measles virus, mumps vaccine virus and rubella vaccine virus, and wild strains of the aforementioned viruses) results in ileal lymphoid nodular hyperplasia, chronic colitis and pervasive developmental disorder including autism (RBD), in some infants.”
I have also found that regressive behavioral disorder (RBD) in children is associated with measles, mumps and rubella vaccination.
In sworn testimony in a congressional hearing Mr. Wakefield states that an “environmental insult” (previously discussed at length as vaccination) “in many children, clearly, the subset of autistics, it leads to gut infection and damage…”
So finally, in summary, we have an environmental insult in perhaps a genetically susceptible child. The problem is that if you go to Sweden now, autism affects over 1.2 percent of the pediatric population. So if there is a genetic background, it is clearly widely distributed within the population. We believe that in many children, clearly, the subset of autistics, it leads to gut infection and damage; that leads to an ingress, an impaired metabolism, degradation of these chemicals from the gut which then get through and impact upon the brain.
In the video for the press conference for his (now retracted) 1998 Lancet paper, Mr. Wakefield stated that the single (monovalent) vaccines are “safer than the polyvalent”. How can they be safer if there isn’t a proven link to autism?
My opinion, again, is that the monovalent, the single vaccines, measles, mumps and rubella, are likely in this context to be safer than the polyvalent vaccine.
and his feeling is that “the risk of this particular syndrome developing is related to the combined vaccine…”:
Again, this was very contentious and you would not get consensus from all members of the group on this, but that is my feeling, that the, the risk of this particular syndrome developing is related to the combined vaccine, the MMR, rather than the single vaccines.
From the Power of One Idea” rally, Washington DC, April 21, 2002 . Mr. Wakefield informs the public that public health officials have failed and “Among the reasons for this failure is the fact that they are faced with the prospect that they themselves may be responsible for the epidemic”:
We are in the midst of an international epidemic. Those responsible for investigating and dealing with this epidemic have failed. Among the reasons for this failure is the fact that they are faced with the prospect that they themselves may be responsible for the epidemic.
Therefore, in their efforts to exonerate themselves they are an impediment to progress. I believe that public health officials know there is a problem; they are, however, willing to deny the problem and accept the loss of an unknown number of children on the basis that the success of public health policy – mandatory vaccination – by necessity involves sacrifice.
Neither I, nor my colleagues subscribe to the belief that any child is expendable. History has encountered and dealt with such beliefs.
You, the parent’s and children, are the source of the inspiration and strength for our endeavours; our quest for truth through science – a science that is compassionate, uncompromising and uncompromised.
I do not mean to stir you to mutiny, but be assured that armed with this science it is in your power to force this issue, in your pediatricians office, in Congress, in the Law Courts.
Keep faith with your instincts. They have served you well.
Our new paper is not anti-vaccine. It is about the safest way in which to deliver these vaccines to children in order to protect them against acute infectious disease and against the long-term adverse reactions that I believe we are now seeing
WAKEFIELD: .. these children received not one dose but three doses of the MMR vaccine, and what we see in many of these children is a double hit phenomenon. They regress after the first dose and then they regress further after the second dose. This child did not receive his first MMR vaccine until he was 4 years 3 months of age. He then deteriorated into autism, a disintegrative disorder. He then received his second dose at 9 years of age and disintegrated catastrophically. He became incontinent of faeces and urine and he lost all his residual skills. This is not coincidence.
This is not to be considered an exhaustive list. I won’t be surprised if more quotes from Mr. Wakefield are in the media. But these should suffice: Mr. Wakefield has, repeatedly, stated that MMR causes autism.
Wakefield suggests it causes autism because it DOES cause Autism!
Not only has the US vaccine compensation court actually awarded payment for vaccine induced autism in about 86 families (you read it correctly - 86!!), but now the Italian court has recently followed suit.
How many more cases like this is it going to take before the medical community comes clean about a generation they helped to destroy?
Utterly disgraceful blog. I have to ask, are you payrolled by Merck by any chance? One certainly has to wonder.
It was a witch hunt.:
Wakefield, Murch and Walker-Smith have never said that MMR causes all autism or that MMR is solely responsible for the rise in autism. It is within national broadcasting and broadsheet journalism that these claims have been made.
Selective Hearing, Brian Deer and the GMC, Dr Andrew Wakefield Autism MMR Film
One doesn't have to wonder as I've answered that question multiple times: no, I am not paid to write here.
I would refer you to the Omnibus Autism Proceedings where the Wakekefield MMR hypothesis was presented at length. The special masters overseeing the hearings were very clear: the hypothesis is without merit.
So one Italian court case supersedes all American cases? Nice way of moving the posts. Why not link to the actual ruling instead of a blog that talks about the ruling? At least Sullivan linked to the actual statements so we could verify them ourselves. That's one big problem for the anti-vax crowd. They link to each other instead of linking to the actual "evidence" they want to provide. They do a pubmed search for papers whose titles somehow validate their positions, but they don't even bother reading the conclusions.
So how many is it going to take? The answer is easy... A statistically significant number. One that is statistically different from the number of expected cases in the general population. That's how many. Bring that number forth in a well-designed, peer-reviewed epidemiological study, and we can talk.
Liz Hempel must have an alert for St Andy's name at your blog (and likely several others). Aside from a handful of poorly designed and even more poorly received studies, all results find no link. Liz needs to find another deity. Wakefield lied. Wakefield committed fraud. It should be the end but as Ren says, those goalposts...