Deer’s fraud case in BMJ
by
JohnLPosted
Fri 07 Jan 2011 5:00am
Brian Deer, the journalist who has doggedly pursued the story about a link between materials in vaccines and the onset of childhood Autism proposed by Dr. Andrew Wakefield and colleagues in the late 1990s, has published details explaining why he considers the original research establishing that link to have been fraudulent. In the first of [...]
Read on »
Brian Deer’s Boss Joins Board of MMR Manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline
by
Kim S.Posted
Tue 03 Mar 2009 2:09pm
Contributing Editor John Stone reports from London: Six days before Brain Deer’s latest attack on Andrew Wakefield – his first Sunday Times journalism for 18 months – it was announced that the proprietor of the Sunday Times and London Times...
Read on »
BMJ Editor Refuses to Acknowledge Brian Deer’s Role as Complainant in GMC Case
by
Kim S.Posted
Tue 18 May 2010 12:00amDeer’s role as complainant in the UK General Medical Council hearing against Andrew Wakefield, John Walker-Smith and Simon Murch in two articles by him that it has published on the subject. Deer’s role was defined by a High Court ruling by Mr Justice Eady in 2006 who stated
“Well before the programme was broadcast [Mr Deer] had made a complaint to the GMC
Read on »
Deer's MMR Wakefield "Fraud" Story Not Playing in the UK, Deer's Wheels Coming Off His Cart
by
Ginger T.Posted
Sat 15 Jan 2011 2:50pm
The Bash Wakefield crew seems to finally have overplayed its hand in the UK. And Deer... well... true colors are showing.
For the last two weeks, the US media has been pounding Deer's fraud allegations. The UK media has ignored them.
In the US, a CNN blogger is calling for Wakefield to be brought up on criminal charges (ironically... even
Read on »
Brian Deer’s Boss Joins Board of MMR Manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline
by
Kim S.Posted
Mon 02 Mar 2009 12:00am
Contributing Editor John Stone reports from London: Six days before Brain Deer’s latest attack on Andrew Wakefield – his first Sunday Times journalism for 18... that might have the potential for serious impact upon the group's business and reputation".
Deer’s article was followed by a string of attacks on Wakefield’s integrity in the Sunday
Read on »
Harvey Marcovitch and Brian Deer’s investigation: the Lord High Everything Else?
by
Kim S.Posted
Tue 18 Jan 2011 12:00am
By John Stone
Amongst the signatures on the British Medical Journal editorial accompanying Brian Deer’s latest ambush of Andrew Wakefield the name... Investigations which specialises in investigating doctors and bringing them before the GMC ( HERE ). It was MLI that boasted of its involvement in Brian Deer’s initial investigation
Read on »
Histopathologist from the Lancet study Rebuffs Brian Deer’s Article in British Medical Journal
by
Kim S.Posted
Fri 30 Apr 2010 12:00am
By John Stone
A letter in on-line BMJ today from, Susan E Davies, one of the signatory histopathologists to the Lancet paper ( HERE ), rebuts Brian Deer’s imputation that there was anything amiss with the interpretation of the histopathology results in the study. This should finally knock on the head the claim made by Deer first
Read on »