On radio, television, in books, film documentaries and the internet, Danny Schechter has been fighting the good, progressive fight since his college days. We first met in 1969 or 1970, when he hosted a radio show in Boston and I produced my then-husband's radio show in New York. Later, we both worked as producers at 20/20 on ABC-TV. (Danny's Wikipedia entry is here )
For several years, in connection with Globalvision, of which is he is co-founder, Danny has been writing the News Dissector blog – a never-miss stop on my morning news rounds. Yesterday, he published a remarkable story about the opposition surrounding the debate about the creation of the income tax, Social Security, the TVA and Medicare. The arguments being made against today's health care reform are astonishingly similar.
The fair use doctrine of the U.S. copyright law allows only limited reproduction of copyrighted material so I shouldn't publish Danny's blog post in its entirety. But I'm going to because it is so enlightening and hope that Danny won't mind. Perhaps some of you, in response, will visit Danny's blog, subscribe to it and maybe buy a book. You won't be wasting your time or money.
[From Danny Schechter the New Dissector – 14 September 2009] DON’T KNOW MUCH ABOUT HISTORY?
My brother Bill, a historian and history teacher researched OPPOSITION TO HEALTH CARE REFORM IN (AMERICAN) HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE:
1. 16th AMENDMENT/THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX (1913) “As to the general policy of an income tax, I am utterly opposed to it. I believe with Gladstone that it tends to make a nation of liars. I believe it is the most easily concealed of any tax that can be laid, the most difficult of enforcement, and the hardest to collect; that it is, in a word, a tax upon the income of honest men and an exemption, to a greater or lesser extent, of the income of rascals; and so I am opposed to any income tax in time of peace…I hope that if the Constitution is amended in this way the time will not come when the American people will ever want to enact an income tax except in time of war.”
- Republican Congressman Sereno E. Payne of New York, 1912
2. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY/ TVA (1933) Built government dams that generated “public power: to help electrify rural America and provide a “yardstick” for fair energy prices.
“[We] are willing to be put out of business if it can be done in a plain straightforward business like manner, but we do object to our Government putting us out of business.”
- John D. Battle, Executive Secretary of the National Coal Association
3. SOCIAL SECURITY (1935) “A cruel hoax [and part of an] unjust, unworkable, stupidly drafted, and wastefully-financed” program.
Report of House Way & Means Republican members on proposed Social Security Bill, 1935 (Excerpts) • The Federal Government has no power to impose this system upon private industry;
• We also oppose these two titles because they would not in any way contribute to the relief of present economic conditions, and might in fact retard economic recovery;
• The original bill contained a title providing for voluntary annuities;
• This was another attempt to place the Government in competition with private business.
• These titles impose a crushing burden upon industry and upon labor. They establish a bureaucracy in the field of insurance in competition with private business;
• They destroy old age retirement systems set up by private industries, which in most instances provide more liberal benefits than are contemplated under title II.
4. MEDICARE (1965) The AMA placed advertisements in major newspapers and funded radio and television spots, all deploying the usual red-brush of “socialism,” and even the specter of jack-booted federal bureaucrats violating “the privacy of the examination room.”
From the narration from an anti-Medicare AMA recording: “Now this is the choice we’re faced with: on the one hand, we can help those who need help while preserving the right of the self-reliant to finance their own care. Or we can legislate a compulsory national health scheme for the aged, regardless of whether they need it or not...Americans are being asked to choose between a system of medicine practiced in freedom and a system of socialized medicine for the elderly which will be expanded into socialized medicine for every man, woman, and child in the United States.”
The voice of Ronald Reagan: “Write those letters now. Call your friends, and tell them to write them. If you don’t, this program I promise you will pass just as surely as the sun will come up tomorrow. And behind it will come other federal programs that will invade every area of freedom as we have known it in this country, until, one day...we will awake to find that we have socialism. And if you don’t do this, and if I don’t do it, one of these days, you and I are going to spend our sunset years telling our children, and our children’s children, what it once was like in America when men were free.”
As you know, Social Security and Medicare are the two most popular public programs ever created by the federal government. I will not repeat all the reasons we have discussed here about why the public option is crucial. But now, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who strongly supported it until this past weekend, and Senate leader Harry Reid have backed off support and Maine Senator Olympia Snowe, a member of the “gang of six,” on one of the Sunday political talk fests, called for no public option at all.
A majority of Americans (although not a majority of elders) support a public option. Without it, a health reform bill will continue and perpetuate corporate domination of health care. There is no reason for any member of Congress not to support a public option other than the millions of dollars the health industry has poured into their election campaigns.
Many of us have been regularly writing our Congressional representatives. Please don't stop and it is now critical to include Pelosi, Reid and Snowe. Here is how to contact them: